 | | Re: All hail the new Ambassador!
|
|
(...) I guess 2 out of 4 aint bad ;) ROSCO (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: All hail the new Ambassador!
|
|
(...) Those Jedi mind tricks apparently only work on the weak minded. What are you suggesting? a (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: State of the MDP?
|
|
I got mine on Tuesday Morning from LEGO-Do not reply Mailbox -- SUBJ: Mindstorms Developer Program We are sorry...9000 people applied...you are not one of the lucky 100...but you can reserve yours now...Click here and we will email when they are (...) (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: All hail the new Ambassador!
|
|
(...) Or a Jedi. Richie: You don't want to choose that Seppo for the last Ambassador spot. Steve W: I don't want to choose that Seppo for the last Ambassador spot. Richie: You want to choose Ritchie. Steve W: I want to choose Ritchie. JOHN (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: State of the MDP?
|
|
(...) Nope. I haven't gotten an e-mail either way. I'm not sure why the "bummer" e-mail hasn't arrived yet. I've even looked in the spam folder to make sure it didn't go there. And I know that I'm looking in the right e-mail account because I have (...) (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: All hail the new Ambassador!
|
|
(...) ?? I never knew Richie was an amatuer magician ?? Oh but of course he must be to have been accepted as a LEGO ambassador ;) ROSCO (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: State of the MDP?
|
|
"pisymbol" <pisymbol@gmail.com> wrote in message news:IvIsyw.1vHI@lugnet.com... (...) No word here! Bob (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: State of the MDP?
|
|
(...) I have not heard anything either, not that I was really expecting a 'Yes', but I haven't even gotten a 'No'... (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: All hail the new Ambassador!
|
|
(...) Well that can only be a good thing... hopefully he will have less time for palming... I do worry about his emotional capital tho! Just kidding Richie, nice job, congrats. Janey "Red Brick" (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: All hail the new Ambassador!
|
|
(...) It means that, being under an NDA, we'll be hearing even less from him. a (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl21 - Can Stacking
|
|
(...) ya... its called sumo. easy. entry level. no real play area requierd. naw. i dont like the idea. ;) Chris (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 wide train design wanted for NMRA fund raiser
|
|
(...) Finally found a few minutes to slap together version 1.0 of an idea I had, trying to model the 2 new trains LEGO is coming out with. I had limited time, so for now only the passenger train. Several modifications are pending, the cantilever is (...) (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | LNER 4468 "Mallard" - sorry but it's not a two-wide
|
|
Hello again... Some thanks first: to Samarth Moray for critiquing the model today and helping me improve it and Mark Bellis for bringing the proto to my attention over on Brickish. My six-wide take on a Mallard, the fastest recorded steam train. (2 (...) (19 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Gear lash....
|
|
(...) But suppose at time 20 your robot is pointed at between 10 and 30 degrees due to the steering defect. Then it has lost even more ground to the moving target. (...) Your thinking is probably correct if the robot can sample the light reasonably (...) (19 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 wide train design wanted for NMRA fund raiser
|
|
(...) After telling Ross about your proposed project, he reworked a loco he had built a few years ago in red: (URL) JOHN (19 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: rtl21 - Can Stacking
|
|
(...) I don't know about it sound like one more of those driving around randomly until you find something and then do an action and repeat. I think that something without that random driving around factor might seem more appealing. Maybe similar to (...) (19 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Gear lash....
|
|
Thanks for sharing your source, Dave! I don't know about anyone else, but reading that added to my design and programming knowledge. (19 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Scale Question
|
|
In lugnet.build, Timothy Gould wrote: <snip> (...) Yes, but 1 caveat. 1stud/foot is actually 10 wide, and probably the best scale given the gauge of LEGO track. The problem is that the LEGO train wheels are too tiny, and the train motor wheels set (...) (19 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Scale Question
|
|
(...) In any event, I can't believe that you didn't suggest your awesome little applet, (URL) Lego Scale Converter> as a resource! Very useful. And Geeky:-d Thanks again for creating it, Dave! (not to be confused with Dave!!:-) JOHN (19 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Dutch 1851 - by Joep Klazen
|
|
(...) (URL) This> shot shows the scale improvements beautifully. I still like my toy train size but I agree it is improved in eight-wide. Tim (19 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
