To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *523952 (-5)
  Re: Dutch 1851 - by Joep Klazen
 
(...) (URL) This> shot shows the scale improvements beautifully. I still like my toy train size but I agree it is improved in eight-wide. Tim (20 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 
  Re: LEGO Scale Question
 
(...) In terms of numbers, somewhere around 1:38 to 1:44, depending on your preference. Most people seem to use one of: 1 stud (8mm) = 1 minifig foot 3 studs (24mm) = 1 minifig meter 1 minifg (42mm) = 6 feet tall But then again, many models are (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.build)
 
  Re: LEGO Scale Question
 
(...) To elaborate slightly on Lenny's statement above, a layout with 8 wide trains will usually use about 1stud/foot whereas a layout with 6 wide trains will use a smaller scale. Depends on whether your figs are tall and wide or short and normal (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.build)
 
  Re: LEGO Scale Question
 
(...) There really isn't anything "generally accepted." But since figs are so oddly shaped, it makes finding a standard scale practically impossible. What I've seen the most is 1 stud=1 foot, but that makes figs only slightly taller than 5 ft. But (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.build)
 
  State of the MDP?
 
So did everyone who is not in the MDP get their "bummer" email???? I haven't heard anything either way that's why I'm asking. -aps (20 years ago, 2-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics)

Skipped 2 messages in group lugnet.off-topic.debate (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR