 | | Re: Dutch 1851 - by Joep Klazen
|
|
(...) I think that, yes, your bias is clouding your judgment, because it is obviously clear why he went 8 wide to model this train-- because he totally nails the look and feel of the proto by doing it. Compare it to his 6 wide version. There is no (...) (20 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Going underground for the week...
|
|
(...) I think that's about right. We start at 1 or whatever. Each round, whoever can make it, they make it, if they can't, they sit out. Your "availability" is basically however many rounds you can run. Obviously if eight robots show up, we can't (...) (20 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Firefox search plugins for LEGO sites
|
|
(...) Lugnet sets database (I leave you to find an appropriate icon if you wish): <search version="0.1" name="Lugnet" description="Lugnet - LEGO Set Search" action="(URL) <input name="q" user=""> </search> ROSCO (20 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Harmonizing Syntax of TLAS, LMM, and LDA2006
|
|
(...) Thank you, Miguel. (...) As discussed earlier, I am now convinced of the animation potentials of MPDs. As a (not very active, but yet...) member of the LDraw Standards Commitee, I am also convinced of the benefits we all would enjoy if all (...) (20 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.animation, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Going underground for the week...
|
|
(...) So what is the plan? We start the competition around 1 or 2 and since there's no Plan B at this time ('cause I don't have time to run something on the side and no one's stepped up)... i was thinking the other night that if we say we're running (...) (20 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
