 | | Re: Has anyone thought of this?
|
|
(...) Yeah but the ones on the motor (that do the actual driving) have rubber rings. Until they get worn down. So I guess it's not an issue for non-driven wheels, but your example suggested you're thinking about using them for driving too. ROSCO (20 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone thought of this?
|
|
(...) Yes, I know this too. In fact my first choice WAS the 2x2 round plate for this same reason, and I didn't think of it as being as good for the same reason. But it can easily be greebled up externally by bogie detailing, and be made to look (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Make tracks in LDraw
|
|
(...) It took me a while to figure out the angle and a rotation point, but here you go. (URL) Dean Earley, Dee (dean@earlsoft.co.uk) irc: irc://irc.blitzed.org/ web: (URL) +44 (0)780 8369596 (20 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone thought of this?
|
|
(...) I think you're gonna have a couple of problems with it: The 2x2 round parts don't always attach very strongly to the flange parts - and as they carry the weight and provide the traction, they will probably be prone to falling off unless you (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why Java for Robots (university vs hobbyists)
|
|
(...) Maybe we are at cross purposes here. You may be right, that for many hobbyists, Java is too advanced and complex, and since their needs are simpler, C is more than enough. Ease of use and low cost is probably more important than computing (...) (20 years ago, 19-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
