 | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) Yes, I would be great. But while it doesn't distinguish, we have to deal with it. I think the naming convention we had had before the .ldr extension, with officicial models named m926.dat and so on, solves this problem. So I suggest you name (...) (20 years ago, 15-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Colossal Castle Contest III
|
|
Hello all, Classic-Castle.com is pleased to announce (URL) Colossal Castle Contest III> our third annual large contest. There are nine categories, ranging in size from customized minifigs to large castles covering multiple baseplates, so there are (...) (20 years ago, 15-Nov-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.castle, lugnet.build.contests, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
|
(...) Would you rather we discuss your haircut instead???? ROSCO (20 years ago, 15-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
|
(...) You know what is even more scary... I posted 250 or so Lego related pics to a Lego website (this one, right here) and I am getting MORE feedback on the 14 offtopic pics I posted. Giggle, (geeks!!!) Janey "Life is strange, Red Brick" (20 years ago, 15-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
|
| |
| | Creator Tub #5369
|
|
Not great news, but you can find Creator Tub #5369 at Kroger's with Kroger card for $9.95/tub. I picked one up today... no suprise parts in it. :( --Mike. (20 years ago, 15-Nov-05, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
|
(...) not mistaken... ROSCO (20 years ago, 15-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) Getting back to the problem at hand, yes I do think this is a bug in L3P, the line specifically says include 926.ldr. Maybe L3P should include the extension as part of the inc file name unless it is .DAT? Of course that will break if the parts (...) (20 years ago, 15-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
|
(...) Whew..... thank goodness you were able to post that one. I was afraid it had been lost to the ages... I was worried that you didn't have any media in your camera, or perhaps the battery had died just as the flash went.... but thankfully all is (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 3x1 curved slope available in dark bluish gray
|
|
(...) Do you know which one it was? [LEGOSet 8657] contains two in light bley and [LEGOSet 8655] contains four in black as well as two red and two white Slope Brick 45 1 x 1 x 2/3. A great set for parts (see (URL) inv>), even if you do end up with (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.parts, lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
|
(...) You just seem to have too much fun! And I don't think any of the time was wasted at all. JB ps: Great pics :) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) I read Steve's email as saying that they shouldn't and that the extension doesn't matter but IMO it does. Rereading it, it sounds like the extension does matter but that it shouldn't be used to identify the type of file which I agree with. /me (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) I don't think L3P pays any attention to parts.lst. To be honest, I don't think that it should. It's not an editor that's expected to give you a list of parts available for use. (And to be honest, I think that parts.lst is a generally bad idea, (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) The point is that it is not MLCad which differentiates, it is mklist. Tim (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) But that DOES differentiate between .dat and .ldr by the very fact it has the extension in parts.lst. If it didn't, 3010.dat and 3010.ldr would be interchangeable everywhere. This means that 3010.dat is NOT the same as 3010.ldr but L3P appears (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) No, it doesn't. (...) MLCad has no such restriction - that restriction is put in place by mklist. Go ahead - create parts/3010.LDR, edit parts.lst, add 3010.LDR and a description, it will magically appear in MLCad and be usable just as any (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) Actually, there's really no easy way to do part detection, but filenames really aren't a good idea. I'm pretty sure Lars is fully aware of the part detection problem (since it also affects the seams option in L3P), and there have been (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Scorpion
|
|
Eric Sophie schrieb: (...) It is now on the parts tracker. mikeheide (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) Surely the very fact it is .ldr instead of .dat differentiates it from the lego parts. MLCad doesn't recognise 3010.ldr as a valid part, and it allows both blah.dat and blah.ldr in the same mpd file. (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
|
(...) Nice to see them (URL) using a CC2800>, although it is a bit scary being able to identify a crane from such a distance... ROSCO (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
|
(...) I agree with that - it's much easier for the user to eliminate such conflicts (eg call the set file set-926.ldr) than expect the software to make such decisions for you. ROSCO (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
|
