|
|
 | | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
| (...) The length of time a top will spin depends (in part) on its diameter. As a result the analogy to a pleasant conversation (during which, to my ears, there has been no ranting or raving) about FLL allowing NQC or not breaks down. John Hansen (21 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: O-Train
|
| Sweet! I saw this a while back with some of the club pics (one of the rare occasions I actually check out something like that) and your model was one of those that struck me. I see the BNSF buffers have made their first (?) MOC appearance as well. (...) (21 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | Re: NQC release
|
| (...) It turns out one of the steps in the process I used to generate the .tgz source code archive not only got the wrong version from CVS but it changed all my unix-style line endings back to windows-style line endings. I've replaced the latest (...) (21 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | Re: Two Vigs
|
| (...) Hey andrew, nice MOCs! The racing track one is nice, I like the use of djred. I'm not sure what the hammer is supposed to be in the second one though. Thanks! XFUT to people.teens Legoswami (21 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.build.vignette, lugnet.people.teens)
| | | | | Re: O-Train
|
| (...) Jason, I haven't kept up to pace on close-coupling of train cars, but I'm really impressed by your solution. It is low-profile, shared trucks, and looks very clean, simple, and straight-forward. A fresh-look by you without working knowledge of (...) (21 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
|
