 | | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
|
I'm really tired of arguing this. Nobody's minds are being changed. I still think it's a trivial rule change for FLL to fix this and it's long past time that they opened their minds to NQC and other similar systems based on Java or Forth. Other (...) (21 years ago, 11-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
|
(...) The guys at NASA *are* undoubtedly very smart at working around problems - but that's a REALLY poor example (and I know everyone uses it). If you look at what they actually came up with, it boils down to using some available plastic and (...) (21 years ago, 11-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Ralph Hempel wrote: <snip> (...) This has been my experience. Being in a room full of kids who are all jazzed up on technology, math and science is wonderous. Listening to a kid describe how she discovered subroutines is (...) (21 years ago, 11-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: "Ads by Goooooogle" at Brickshelf?
|
|
"Tore Eriksson" <tore.eriksson@mbox3...wipnet.se> wrote in message news:ID5qEn.CDv@lugnet.com... (...) in my (...) topics, (...) ads in (...) my PC (...) Hi Tore.. I think it is the "Language" setting in your browser that tells what ads to show. (...) (21 years ago, 11-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: FLL not allowing NQC; Mindscript is allowed
|
|
(...) No programming can compensate for a robot that hasn't mechanical means for completing the mission objectives. But it doesn't take a very sophisticated robot to complete the objectives in the competitions. Many of the teams I saw at this years (...) (21 years ago, 11-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
