|
|
 | | RE: FLL not allowing NQC
|
| Actually, I had spent some time musing whether RCXs in tandem could be used for the DARPA competition (haven't looked at the rules, tho), because I was wondering if this would be a fun challenge for an advanced class... If Labview can run the Mars (...) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| | |  | | Re: Space Penguins
|
| Well there are many things I like here. First off I love the rear of the ship, nice taper job there, the front/cockpit area are excellent and compliment the shape of the whole thing, and finally the color choices are superb. All around a great (...) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: FLL not allowing NQC
|
| (...) I took a hard look at the rules for the last DARPA competition. That was then I discovered that it is a shining example of a highly biased competition. You cannot just show up and compete. You can only compete if you can demonstrate that your (...) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| | |  | | Re: FLL not allowing NQC
|
| As far as I am concerned, you can quote me. My view is that anything that isn't against the rules is allowable, and the rules are the rules. If you don't think they are fair, ask for them to be chaanged or go to other competitions. There were not (...) (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| | |  | | Re: Announcing: SWELUG 7
|
| (...) Sådärja! Nu är även jag hemma och uppkopplad. Hemresan gick mycket bra. Nu zzka jag zzzova... (21 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.loc.se)
| |