 | | Re: Another Turtle Creek MOC (the mine building)
|
|
(...) It's a beautiful building and an awesome creation--captures the look and feel of the original extremely well. And the other mocs--beautiful! Nicely done! Dave K (21 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Laying smack (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) <snmip> (...) Oh we'll be layin' the smack down for whomever we choose... no worries there. rtlT is known as the smack daddy of 'em all! smack smack smack!!! Who shall get smacked (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Turtle Creek MOC (the mine building)
|
|
(...) Beautiful work! I was looking at the same articles in Model Railroader and thinking of building the mine building, before I saw that you were doing this project. (BayLTC suffers from a lack of "industries" on our layout) I think the mottled (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Experimenting with camera.dat and look_at.dat
|
|
(...) Yes,I am very well aware of the multitude of camera settings POV offers, and I haven't yet decided which way to go. The fastest way may be to run my own race using my own META statements: 0 LDA CAMERA.POSITION x y z 0 LDA CAMERA.LOOKAT x y z 0 (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Turtle Creek MOC (the mine building)
|
|
(...) This thing went together really quickly, at least by my standards. What made it even more interesting was the fact that we basically built it upside-down, starting with the tallest tower and building toward what would be the ground. It did (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
