 | | Re: Wire routing
|
|
The conductor plate gets you away from having to build a recessed area for the 2x2x2p wire plate. How did you do that anyway? I hit this issue and poked around and finally consulted to oricle, James Mathis, HE TOLD ME TO DO IT THIS WAY! ;) SteveB (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Anatomy of a POV file (e.g. L3P suggestions)
|
|
(...) Hi Lars, I'd prefer that the format is unchanged. Right now LPub post-proceses the one file, greying parts as needed, adjusting camera settings for orthographic, and creating new colors for the greyed pieces.... I'd really rather *not* have to (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
i completly agree. OnDrew J. Hartigan 21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
|
|
(...) Don't sell yourself short. :) Creating good models with a limited selection of parts is an artform... if you ask me. With a large (I hesistate to use the word 'unlimited') selection of parts even an average builder can likely create more or (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption 2.0
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote: (snip) (...) (snip) Nevermind the controls, how'd you build the hopper? ;-) I really like your solution, with the rotating arm that unloads it, creating an auto-reset for the hopper. I've been frustrated (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Wire routing
|
|
(...) Nope. Just the 2x2 wire connector straight onto the motor. Of course there is a tile on top of the wire connector and the layered plate floor/frame has a cutout, I'm pretty sure that's not the source of the resistance, I tested that with 2 (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Anatomy of a POV file (e.g. L3P suggestions)
|
|
(...) I am anything but an expert on this area, but will not the parts, 3001_dot_dat and so on, also be defined multiple times? (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: surrender, you're surrounded!
|
|
(...) The issue wasn't explicitly stated as such. The issue was explicitly stated, in the original post, as coming from the AFOL community, not just you. (...) ANd you should, indeed, state your opinion, but make it abundantly clear that it is your (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
Dear Calum: I disagree with you entirely. (...) Really? I think some people wished for the color issue to go away, didn't get their wish, and whined like petulant brats. (...) Nobody asked you to write any such letters. But don't slander the right (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Anatomy of a POV file (e.g. L3P suggestions)
|
|
(...) For newbies I think it's nice that the POV file is self-contained and ready-to-render. However, using certain coming options you can exclude camera and lights. Why would you like submodels in separate .inc files ? Only to have a smaller (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
