To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *489822 (-20)
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: ... Calum, just wanted to say that I completely agree. Your post actually made me fire up a browser, find your post in the web interface, log in, go back to the post, and spotlight it. That's how much (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) Give it up Gil. all your members belong to US now. (screams) RTL!!! um no wait. maybe thats WHY people now hang out here. actually there are about a MILLION reasons people like RTL. just off the top of my head: Elitist, pretentious, (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  SHHHH! That was supposed to be secret... (was Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company blah blah blah blah)
 
(...) Now you did it..... you posted the secret message about the secret stash of grey bricks..... -Rob A> (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
Bwahahahaha! I wonder if I should write an open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company asking him to burn this letter you are sending and this whole color issue so Lugnet once more can be about creativity. Who'd sign that? I left this place about a (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
 
  Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
 
(...) Drop by .space or CSF, Joe...we miss you. ;) -Gil (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
 
(...) And we also have a letter of support. Some AFOLs think it's the worst decision LEGO has ever made, while others support LEGO and their right to make decisions about their own products, even if they disagree with them. (...) If opinions are (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)  
 
  (canceled)
 
 
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
(...) We look forward to seeing you there... (...) E-mail me your address. (...) I really like to build my stuff with a very clean look. That usually means hiding all the inner workings. That's why the stairs looked like this in my first build: (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
 
(...) Well Stefan, I try to do my best to come up with alternate models my own because often I'm not really impressed by the official ones. So if you say that the LEGO designers need to work harder I won't disagree with that... ;-) Nathanael (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
 
(...) I'm glad you've enjoyed it! Hopefully the models inspire people and make them enthusiastic. I hope too some designers will notice them. ;-) Nathanael (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
 
(...) Thanks Allen, It seems this creation got some attention and actually I'm a bit surprised. I didn't expect this to happen on a community where I see so many fabulous work of true LEGO artists. To stick with a limited parts selection is indeed (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
 
(...) Thanks Thomas, In my opinion my models just show some of the many possiblities what could be made with a designerset. They're mainly to stimulate people to build MOCs, that's probably why LEGO called them designersets. ;-) But if it will (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Re: MOC4100: Cranetruck
 
(...) Too good??! There's always space for improvements, but I just do my best Paul. Hmm interesting thought that TLC consults with me on the parts selection. Would be nice ofcourse... :-D But if this would be the case it's not completely fair to (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
 
  Dinner Discussion Followup: Ropeway Technology
 
-Brekenridge Resort, CO. Lift: Snowflake. This is the one with the crazy 45 degree turn I was mentioning (URL) grips: Here are some technical related items about detachable grips. (URL) This is a great document from POMA talking a little bit about (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Civil War!
 
In lugnet.color, Richard Noeckel wrote: [snip - just go back and read it] Alright! At last, some clear sense in this morasse! My legions of Bionicle mutant toa heroes stand ready for battle! They are through with being put down. Their patience is (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
(...) Wow, nearly untouched territory... pumping Steve's... oh, never mind. On a more pratical note, does your pump meet the height requirement for the GBC? I've got two ball pumps working, but both have the same problem - allowing room under the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
 
  Re: My open letter.. to the WORLD
 
Hello! (...) Agreed. Though I don't own any. They only come in sets that come with new greys and brown, which I don't buy. Bye Jojo (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color)
 
  Re: Johnny five IS alive - first MOC
 
bricksnap wrote: > Yes, treads are working, but moving is rather bumpy. Because of the construction > of the treads and the huge overall weight they easily broke up. I'm a little suprised that you chose to use just one motor for each tread. The (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Thanks a lot, guys, you've made me hate LUGNET.
 
Hey Jeremiah, As Steve noted, it's pretty easy to stay away from the real acrimonious threads. I pretty much stick to reading specific theme forums. Things aren't really that bad. Look at the posts that are spotlighted right now: 8 are highlighting (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
 
  Re: Thanks a lot, guys, you've made me hate LUGNET.
 
(...) Here here... Although I plan on hanging around and having a look in on LUGNET every so often, I have to agree with you about the mood shift seen over the last year or so. I too like to come here to see others ideas and MOCS. But this constant (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)

Skipped 1 message in group lugnet.admin.general (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR