To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *488431 (-10)
  Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Tore Eriksson
 
I, Willy Tschager, nominate Tore Eriksson. (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
 
  Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Willy Tschager
 
(...) many thx for the nomination, I accept. w. (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 
  Re: January Lugola meeting postponed
 
Hi Scott, Me and Mike Wood will be there. --Dan (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.us.lugola)
 
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
Steve Baker writes: > So simply write into the rules that everyone who submits a left hand > turn has to submit a corresponding right hand turn or they won't > be accepted. Excellent idea! But it's even easier than that!! Do NOT change the (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: New Omicron Republic Senate Chambers
 
(...) Snip WOW, welcome to Lugnet, amazing, and not just for a first post. Spotlighted. If this is your first major MOC after your dark ages I would say we have many things to look forward to. (...) Excellent job. The exterior details are well done (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.town, FTX)
 
  New Omicron Republic Senate Chambers
 
This is my first posting of a MOC so hopefully this will all work out. I got out of my dark ages about a year ago and promptly started building and setting up the universe in which my MOCs would inhabit. When I was a kid I had a big city / universe (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.announce.moc) !! 
 
  Re: MOC: Taun-Taun
 
(...) No, Derek's right... I used glue and Megabloks. Cause, well, Megabloks are cool, and so is gluing them. And anyone who says differently is just crazy. Really though, you got it. I used L plates that connect to a 1x2 technic brick with two (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
 
  Re: Large Propeller
 
(...) That's it! Thanks. (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
 
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
tmassey@obscorp.com writes: > Or not: leave the standard as it is (except for specifying that the space > above the input belongs to the previous module), and have the organizers > build (or specificially request) out-of-spec modules to accomplish (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: The Great Ball Contraption
 
Brian Davis writes: > Instead of that, just make sure that your module delivers through > the "side" of the downstream module's territory. Then the spec should say that the ball should go through a vertical plane, and specify the size of the (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR