|
|
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| In lugnet.lego, David Eaton wrote: <snip> (...) I forgot all about this ine--TLC can't win one way or the other. Nice catch Larry and Dave. (...) As Dave just stated--there was no 'word' given--just the statement of facts that at the time were (...) (21 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| "David Eaton" <deaton@intdata.com> wrote in message news:I9GuDD.nKo@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) we've (...) [ ... snipped ... ] Neither of these posts by LEGO employees is a Press Release. If these posts are what Ken is referring to as (...) (21 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) I'm not sure it qualifies as an actual "press release", but what I think we've been referring to is Jake's post on Lugnet: (URL) the post on 1000steine, which supposedly had very similar content: (URL) almost vaugely remember this set being on (...) (21 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| (...) Yeah, but what they said was true. "This is a small run too – only 14,000 total, with 10,000 coming to Shop At Home." It *WAS* a small run, and it *WAS* limited to 14K, and 10K *DID* go to S@H. Please point out the exact error in the phrase, (...) (21 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| | | | | Re: limp-in mode
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno wrote: <snip> (...) Yeah we get it--Calum propped up a puppet king whilst he makes all the decisions and rules behind the scenes. But if ya want a liitle 'aw shucks--glad Chris is around', then 'aw shucks, (...) (21 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Skipped 9 messages in
groups
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.statistics, lugnet.admin.terms (Skip-filter settings)
|
