 | | Re: Next BayLUG Get-Together in August 1999
|
|
(...) Sadly, I'm gone to the East Coast for both days, but I will be with you in spirit! Someone else will have to take over grab bag responsibilities, though. :^) --Raymond Flournoy ===...=== flournoy@cs.stanford.edu "Because, of course, a man with (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) IIRC, there wasn't any "OMR" at that point...but they both have the same exact underlying philosophy -- capturing a collection of quality models. I always planned to point to the models from the Pause-DB at some point... From April 3: (URL) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Faster-loading pages for super-long threads
|
|
Small changepoint in the way messages are displayed on the web interface: There's a thread going now that's nearly 400 messages long (yes, really!) and this is fine, but it makes for some really unpleasantly plump "connect the dots" thread displays (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Another WTB: 6251
|
|
Does anyone have this pirates minifig set for straight sale? (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) Cool... (...) Ok.. (...) I think it should go to cad.dat.models for unfinished ones... (...) Ok, I was under the understanding that .cad.dat.models.sets was pretty much set and created without the OMR in mind. This works, then... -Tim <>< (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Box #1
|
|
....Hey a Technic box...Wow.... Yes please may I receive this one as well...... Regards Dave djost@cybertrails.com Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message news:37970B3A.C24A4D...ger.net... (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
(...) Certainly! (...) Heck, I sure don't think so. The .dat.models.sets group was intended to be a serious thing. The only question in my mind would be whether to allow in-progress models there (i.e., without an OMR-tagged subject line) or whether (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Entertaining Trade Offers for 2769
|
|
I have an extra 2769 set (the promotional set available from British Airways on international flights) that I am willing to part with so I am offering it up for trade. If you are interested in this set, please let me know. At this point I am not (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: Big Armored Truck
|
|
(...) Well, the truth is that i havn't even taken pics yet... today it fell in the washing machine. i managed to get it out. it has 3 missile packs, 4 machine guns, 2 grenade launchers, and 2 lasers. the main body, without the wheels and guns, is (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
|
At 10:40 PM 7/22/99 , Todd Lehman wrote: [...] snippety snip (...) Right.. (...) Now that's making sense. I was following the assumption that nothing would change on cad.dat.models.sets and OMR submissions would be *allowed* there. Could we change (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
