 | | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
|
(...) Is this true? I've been out of the "official update" loop for a while, but when I suggested this method a year or so ago it was rejected due to "sub-part clutter" and the fears of an unreasonable burden upon parts-authors. Has this changed (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: cylinders missing conditional lines?
|
|
(...) Actually, if you use conditional lines that follow the red tangent lines, as in Travis' diagram, then you want them to overlap. You get partial coverage from each of them that adds up to the total coverage you'd get from the original style of (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Most stunning motorbike ever?!?
|
|
Hey do you guys think this might have been a preview of a real set? It at least looks like it could be. I wonder why it was removed. I really wanted to show it to someone. Speculation? Thoughts? That would be one heck of a set. I'd buy it in a snap. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: three mountainbikes
|
|
(...) I really like these, Lars. Perhaps the black bike needs the front forks at a greater angle to increase the wheelbase? Otherwise, it's close, but too square as you mentioned. Still a great model, though. Thanks for sharing, Ed (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
|
(...) So I understand that studlogos may face any direction as long as they are not mirrored? How about a mix of rotated studlogos on one single part instead of all studslogos facing the same direction? E.g. some studlogos readable when the part is (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
