 | | Re: Debut MOC: "Voodoo Child"
|
|
(...) Thank you. I wanted to give you guys something nice. (...) I've been ordering from the print catalog, sorry, no link. I do have the order number though. P970098-118, price 13.00 The set in question has some other really nice parts. Take care, (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Debut MOCs: Landmate Frenzy
|
|
(...) Sorry, should have been more clear. It was a present, but I had to split the price with the giver. Long story, don't ask, blah blah blah. I do know of someone who got one at half price, but I have no more information. Take care, Soren (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: EPII Republic Assault Ship
|
|
(...) Looks suspiciously like a Jedi Starfighter supersized and painted gray. ;-) Very cool MOC, BTW. Nathan Wells (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Show Your Support of STS-107
|
|
My tribute: (URL) is based on the "missing man plane formation" that is used to salute lost fliers, using the remaining three shuttles. Joe Meno (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there a NQC HowTo out there someplace?
|
|
"Jeff Merrick" <jeffmerrick@gmx.net> wrote in message news:H9p6GK.1ou@lugnet.com... (...) need (...) Jonathan (...) to (...) book; (...) I will have a look at the tutorial from Mark Overmars site. But I've got a "Teach yourself C in 21 days" by (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Divorce?
|
|
(...) Thanks...but I was just saying what I thought came right. (...) I'm not sure why some cannot comprehend sarcasm...in today's society, we *need* humor more than anything. Talking about life as it is shows lurkers that us lego fans have normal (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Worst LEGO experience
|
|
(...) Was it an accident or did someone dare you? :-) You inhaled it? By your mouth? It's a luck it wasn't a regular 1x1 plate, thoses little corners would have been rough! Terry (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Divorce?
|
|
(...) Well, I'll break my "This is my final post in this thread" promise to reply to the first post in this thread that's right on the spot. Matt, I salute you. I mean, come on people. I don't deserve to be treated this way because i was upset at (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: IR header how optional -- And Infrared "Warm Up"
|
|
Regarding "Henrik Erlandsson" <e.henrik@telia.com> wrote in message news:H9orqL.M9v@lugnet.com.. and others about "warming up" the serial infra-red link electronics. (...) the web (...) does, and if (...) both. (...) I believe the "warm up" concept (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: IR header - A Detailed Explanation
|
|
Several posts have speculated about the use and necessity of the "header" bytes used by standard RCX messaging. Hopefully this post provides definitive information on the topic. The ROM firmware uses a 30 milli-second inter-character timer. If if is (...) (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
