 | | RE: Save the RIS!
|
|
This is an inappropriate tiresome use of the mail list, so please just send your replies directly to the initiator of this thread, Timothy Schroeder, Wolf_and_eagle@spamb...yahoo.com. Tony Burton -----Original Message----- From: (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic Roll call, who are you folks anyway?
|
|
In lugnet.technic, David Koudys writes: BEGIN Instructions (leave intact) -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+- Always reply at the end of the thread! Delete all '<':s, replace the data in the filled in form, leave the empty form in case something goes (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Going to WAMALUG's display on Feb. 8/9
|
|
Hello, I missed you guys. Today would've been much better. I finished up early and even got in a bicycle ride in the light with the clear roads to clear my mind. There will be other times! Is anybody planning on dropping down to see the WAMALUG (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.loc.us.pa.phi.har)
|
| |
| | Re: When (if) to use optional lines?
|
|
(...) Hi Lance, I asked the same question last summer and since then have come to realize optional lines are useful. Here's the thread to my original question (and the many replies): (URL) a thread on how optional lines help smoothing algorithms: (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory?
|
|
(...) Pneumatic Cylinder. :D Each of these prevents your robot from breaking his arm, and doesn't need sensors. I recommend Mario Ferrari's "Building Robots with Lego Mindstorms" for mechanical ideas that simplify the electrical control. (I.e. less (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
