 | | Re: DISTRIBUTED/PARALLEL CLUSTER for legOS through n*RCX
|
|
Yes Kekoa it's a bottle neck, as I wrote on the original message, the main idea is to distribute the load, with the MINIMUM amount of network traffic. I think that all the RCX should be connected through fibre optics, in order to implement the (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Throwing one out to the .space peeps
|
|
In lugnet.space, Gil Shaw writes: <snip some good comments> (...) Yes indeed. More specifically I think that building techniques shared by AFOLs have developed. Each of us had one or two techniques the others might not have thought of, and the (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: I2C device for the RCX
|
|
(...) We'll first check it out before boasting about it ;) The whole thing won't work without some hardware modifications on the lepomux - so I'll tell you about it in two or three weeks. Gunther (22 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: UniBots! Buy yours today!
|
|
(...) Thank you sir. (...) Yeah - he was the second one I did, and I knew it would all be downhill from there. :-) He's my fave too. (...) Cool - I'd be honored. :-) (...) Eh. It happens. :-) -Chris (22 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting BrickOS Timing Results
|
|
Hi Marc, (...) Nice idea, but wouldn't that result in at least one of four cycles beeing blocked by OCRA? or is our system interrupt finished within less than 250msec? (...) Right, that was what I did for my Lepomux patch - works fine. Gunther (22 years ago, 15-Jan-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
