 | | RE: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???
|
|
(...) bug, I (...) left (...) or (...) different (...) Well, those of us who are using the RCX for mission critical applications can't be too careful. -Allen PS: I just finished my Lego open-heart surgeon, I'll post pictures in a few days. -- Did (...) (27 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???
|
|
A more likey reason for a crash is that people will actually believe all these predictions that the markey will crash and try to convert everything to cash. Jasper Janssen wrote in message <36a3cf2e.46618061@l...et.com>... ... (...) ... (27 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Expression limitations w/bytecode
|
|
(...) The supplied programming environment does not allow you to subtract one sensor value from another, but the bytecode interpreter does. See: (URL) see NQC, as Dave Baum pointed out. You do not have to resort to replacement firmware unless you (...) (27 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???
|
|
(...) What do you mean by "internal clock?" You seem to indicate that the microcontroller inside the RCX somehow knows the date. It does not. The only "clock" inside the microcontroller is a counter that counts cycles. It starts at zero when you (...) (27 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: MiniFig Ponderings?
|
|
(...) I wouldn't consider these to be strictly Town Jrish they do have their uses. Consider A Modular building (Like the big Ninja fort) that you want to be able to clip together. You might design a clip that consists of a paired 2X1 brick with Peg (...) (27 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.general)
|
