 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) Even if they have directed it at Target- and all their other retailers- it's ridiculous for them to try and stick the cat back in the bag. What possible purpose does it serve? Why does it benefit them to have people on Lugnet not talk about (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Legal Comedy (was Re: 2001 Set info)
|
|
Dramatis Personae: Our presiding villain -- Todd. The man who is sticking to his TOS and crumpling under threats of bad legal juju. Lover of the brick. Our heroes -- posters of leaked information. More than one and also lovers of the mighty brick. (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Legal Comedy (was Re: 2001 Set info)
|
|
LOL! I can picture Dan Aykroyd character Joe Friday from _Dragnet (1987)_ reading this... LOL! (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Legal Comedy (was Re: 2001 Set info)
|
|
(...) Hmm. That is the problem with debates like this on LUGNET - no conclusion is ever really drawn. Debates just spawl, dilute and die... A bit of a worry really. Scott A (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) What, are you TRYING to annoy me here? You've edited Todd's and my words by trimming away most of the sentence to make it look like I am agreeing with Todd's definition. Gentle readers, do not be fooled by Scott's action here. Scott, I'm (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
