|
|
 | | Re: AFOL article
|
| (...) the norm. No mention of Lugnet, or other electronic resources, though, which is too bad. Golden opportunity missed. Anyone know how this article came to be? Henry hangs out here once in a while I think, but the Michon's don't, I don't think. (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | znap
|
| My local TRU finally got with the program, started the 50% off a second set deal and got some znap in stock. So I bought two znap sets at an average 25% off. The standard price is $30 which with the discount comes to $22.50 each. They have a technic (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: AFOL article
|
| On the topic of factually incorrect, did you notice that in the margin it says "LEGO is plural." My understanding was that LEGO is the company, what we buy are the brick(s) (plural). -Nick Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Following up oneself (Was: Re: Is LEGO safe in Fish Tanks? (Safe for the fish))
|
| (...) [ie, "sorry to follow myself up] (...) There is on Usenet. I'm not sure exactly where it comes from, but it is bad nettiquette. I *think* it's to prevent one person from keeping a thread alive when no one else cares. At any rate, I have seen (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: L3Lab is so awesome!
|
| Mouser X <mouser_x@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FtDxD3.LMB@lugnet.com... (...) Sorry for the unclear humor. "L3" stands (I think) for "Lars, LDraw, & Lego", so it was really quite silly of me to attribute L3Lab to someone named "Tore." If (...) (26 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
