 | | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Rui Manuel Silva Martins writes: <SNIP> (...) until (...) <SNIP> This is not true: Since the renderer has to assume a certain state for his models. The thing (at least in MLCad) works as follows: If BFC is on than the model is (...) (26 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | NELUG's adult's only statement
|
|
this thread brings up the point and mentions their page where the wording is found: (URL) like their wording in the group charter (if/when this point comes up for us) ..joseph g (26 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.org.us.wafol)
|
| |
| | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
|
(...) I believe that it's possible to create a program that automatically fixes the orientation of a part. Take a look at this picture: (URL) The red faces are the back faces and the green faces are the front faces. The image on the left is the part (...) (26 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LED's
|
|
Hi, could anyone tell me how I might light LED's in sequence so that they would simulate a rev counter of an automobile & to also simulate the speed counter. I need to know how I might wire them up and how I might be able to program them using time (...) (26 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
|
(...) I'd like to have all parts compliant by making a second copy of the primitives that can't be inverted instead of using "0 INVERSE" commands. Leonardo (26 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Performance Improvement
|
|
Since the BFC discussion has everything to do with performance improvement, I would like to propose the following changes to the primitives: - 4-4disc.dat - 2-4disc.dat Remove the point which lies in position (0,0,0), because it's NOT required and (...) (26 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Part 6044
|
|
Could anyone tell me if <part:6044> slope with studs is still available and if so, which current sets they would be included in? I think I need at least 4 for a project idea I am working on. Thanks, -Duane (26 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | yeoman? (was "Re: Thank you for translation!")
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) According to my understanding of medieval history in England, a yeoman was a peasant farmer who wasn't a serf. What's a serf? Well, a serf was a peasant farmer who was tied to the land, but was otherwise free, as opposed to a (...) (26 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Microfig Creations and Karim Nassar's Pallas Spaceworks
|
|
Sproaticus wrote in message <38EA1F64.6D7A7A51@io.com>... (...) challenge (...) You seem to be implying that minimalism is something that happens especially in microfig-scale. I don't think that it is. It can be applied at any scale, and I can just (...) (26 years ago, 6-Apr-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Minifig Packs - Thoughts
|
|
(...) I'm going to assume you mean me, not Christopher. (...) <snip> (...) Except, of course, that they are both Star Wars toys, and there is some crossover in the lines. There are many more casual collectors (who buy a few things that relate to (...) (26 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
