 | | Re: Indy & legOS bugs... :-)
|
|
(...) <g>, :-? (...) quali (...) Beh, io ho come riferimento la mia pista di prova. Senza variazioni sulla meccanica (che era quello che mi ero riproposto, se solo avesse funzionato completamente il sw), "dovrei" aver guadagnato circa 0.7 (9.2s (...) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: Sfida LF5: proposta
|
|
(...) robot. (...) dovranno (...) essere (...) l'uno (...) rilevazione (...) Hai perfettamente ragione... Che pollo... :-) Non ci pensavo... (...) collocati (...) A 2 metri di distanza? Non è poco... Io li metterei di fronte sì, ma al max a 25 - (...) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: DINOTRON: A cross-system hybrid MOC theme
|
|
(...) Prolly, but this is more excitement than .duplo gets in a month, usually, right? They say it's good to take your machinery out and floor it every once in a while, cleans out built up gunk and carbon. So we're giving .duplo it's monthly spin. (...) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.duplo)
|
| |
| | Re: Ebay acution - Potential Fraud?
|
|
(...) Nope. It was a photo of the assembled set, sitting in/next to the box, on the person's dining room table. The photo on the offending auction has been changed (possibly because the seller of the original auction complained to eBay?), and the (...) (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: Ebay acution - Potential Fraud?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the clarification. Even LESS covered by Lego copyright and even MORE covered by the copyright asserted by the person who took the photo. ++Lar (26 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
