 | | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
(...) ...Yea, its closer, but overshoots some :-/ (sunken rail beds? :-) ...Its only a nuisance because its close to 2" for either version, and as we all know, LEGO trains do _not_ like going up or down slopes much :-/ (...) ...That's about all I'm (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: J box update - then there were Five!
|
|
(...) I was aware of this potential problem. The bits I have are already in ziplock bags ready to go. If each person takes reasonable care to ensure they can't rattle about too much, all should be fine. Ian Bishop, Ayrshire, UK (26 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: so-called "deep-linking" ruled okay
|
|
(...) Because it might actually be impolite! :) (Matthew didn't say that it was -always- impolte.) I can think of a several cases where it would be (IMHO) impolite to the owner of the site: 1. Where the site specifically asks for it not to occur. (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
|
|
(...) ...Well, since most of the terrain is red bricks, it could also be shielding from the rolling rivers of lava... :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wamalug guy ((URL) #160 (26 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Helfire - a microfig scale castle town
|
|
(...) Er, 1024x1024 minifig studs, sorry. (26 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
