 | | Re: Air lock and ship docking discussion
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) No, it wasn't, but I certainly welcome his input, and from others too. I'd like to see this discussion continue. (...) I'm (...) are (...) That is correct. The craft possessing this airlock is not meant to be small. It is a (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.space)
|
|
 | | Re: Brad Justus...
|
|
(...) Ok. :) (...) If that's what you think will happen, I think you're going to be disappointed. Let's talk some numbers here. Minimums "not too far out of reach of the average builder." Ok, what's that? 10 egg-shaped trees? That's a fair amount of (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
|
 | | NQC RCXLib bug & wish
|
|
Hi! (especially Dave) While trying to get a working communication channel between the PC and the RCX with the original firmware, I discovered a bug in RCXLib: in RCX_Link, BuildTxData, the 3rd bit in the command code is toggled when sending the same (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
 | | Re: datalog viewer in RcxCC
|
|
Matthew Miller wrote in message ... (...) Here's what I got: \windows>echo "blah" > test.txt "blah" > test.txt \windows>type test.txt Can't open the file \windows> Looks like it worked - but the file wasn't created (I couldn't find it using Explorer (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
|
 | | Re: S@H, US catalouge scans
|
|
(...) I have a 1989 Holiday S@H catalog which I've been meaning to scan.. maybe later this week. I have several late 80s US in-box catalogs.. I'll see if any of them are the missings ones. I think at least one is. (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)
|