 | | Re: How much memory finally?
|
|
Thank for the answer, Dave, this is the kind of info I'm looking for. BUT! I don't think it is correct: 0x8000 is 32k: the firmware would start at the end of memory!?! 0xbfff is 48k: unless the 16k of the rom are counted of course... Then this mean (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Old part ID
|
|
(...) great selection of parts. If I could go back in time, I'd buy 10 of those. :] --Colin __ __ __ __ __ __ | |_| |_| |_| | | |_| | | | Brick Engineer | | | Colin R Gutierrez | __ __ __ __ | 2000 | |___...___|| |_| |_| |_| ||___...___| |___...___| (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: TRU.com Xmas fiasco
|
|
Doug, (...) Well, I got $100.00 back. I originally ordered on November 22nd, and did not receive it until the second week in January, which was OK to me, since I just got SW sets for myself. I think it was around $340.00 for my order. As for the (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of LEGO logo
|
|
Michael Edwards wrote in message ... (...) Well that was "exact". (...) This reminds me of the Star Wars clear up a few years ago. The SW clear up was a good thing in a way, as back then there were more SW sites than there are porn sites now. Scott (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Pubblicizzare ItLUG nei negozi?
|
|
"Paolo Masetti" <paolom@pragmanet.it> wrote in message news:Fppzy9.KD6@lugnet.com... (...) questo (...) Accontentato. Io, però, l'ho messo su paolo.masetti@itlug.org, perché non sono MNT di itlog.org..... ;-) -- Cheers Carlo. LUGNET member page: (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of LEGO logo
|
|
(...) Sorry Scott i don't understand? -- Please reply on medwards@ukonline.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Home of the UK Technic Club Magazine www.technic-uk.co.uk - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: www.legodirect.com <--- whats going on?
|
|
(...) Maybe I can shed some light on this. Suzanne is out of the house at the moment, but I have a cc of a mail that she wrote to someone who asked about this on January 3. Here (below) is what she wrote...I don't think she'll mind my posting it (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Use of LEGO logo
|
|
(...) No, what followed (which I snipped) is a paraphrase, IMHO. I think "exact wording' typically means word for word. Can you type in the text of the document or letter outlining your agreement, or are you forbidden from revealing it but allowed (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: General Box #5
|
|
(...) Because it's cute and cheap? It wouldn't be so bad if they didn't come in EVERY blasted Freestyle/Classic/Basic set. What would be best is if they just put them into the smaller sets (then people who like them can easily get some, and those of (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
| | Re: www.legodirect.com <--- whats going on?
|
|
In lugnet.general, Todd Lehman writes: <clarification> Thanks for that, Todd. I 100% think Suzanne did the right thing and further, I would say that given the position she's taken as having done it in order to secure it FOR TLC, and that her intent (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)
|
