To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *104301 (-5)
  Electricity in layout (was Re: Structural weakness in MOCs?)
 
(...) thinking is (...) feed (...) It might not. I don't like doing that cuz IMO it'll strain the 317 regulator to put out what it's supposed to. Even if it could put out 9V with a 7.5V supply, I can't imagine the current remaining the same. I know (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
 
  Re: AAT
 
(...) Wow, good eyes! It definitely looks like a battle droid hand to me. It makes sense too, and I like the use of space for putting a droid in the tank. Is the printed piece above this area a hatch? I seem to remember the hatch being located on (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: bridge designs for big space MOCs
 
(...) Drool! And grumble... Drool, because the design is really a feast for the eyes. Nice job. Grumble, because I was hoping to be the first to use eight of the quarter-dome pieces to assemble a spherical enclosure. You have essentially done that (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.space)
 
  AAT
 
Now that we are throught ripping the MF, I am curious about the AAT. If you look under the wedge piece with the print on it, does it appear that there is a battle droid inside the hole? It looks to me like you can see either a hand or a horizontal (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Newbie Info (was Re: SPAM)
 
(...) Cross-posting an awfully good idea back to where it can get discussed... James (URL) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR