 | | Re: Picture Editing ...
|
|
(...) figured (...) Truly awesome and inspiring work! Don't go too heavy on computer effects though, I think the charm of Lego is it's simplicity - it makes you use your imagination! Hey, has anyone thought of taking duplicate heads and painting (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | ANNOUNCE: UK J-Box Web Site
|
|
Hello! I have taken the law into my own hands and done a Web Site for coordination of future UK J-Boxes. (URL) Could it have a direct link from loc.uk? Carbon60: Could it go on one of your blank bricks. J-Boxers: Could you have a look and let me (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: 5801 ?
|
|
(...) Are you sure it isn't pre-cut to stars and hearts? Look closely... /Eric McC/ (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture Editing ...
|
|
(...) I agree! Lego is just about all we need ;-) of course, *some* modification never hurt anyone... (...) That's a great idea! I was thinking of doing that to Scar but $99 for another storm face is too much ;-) I might just use normal faces or (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Fred Meyer has sets for 50% off
|
|
(...) Where was this, Rose? (Pleasepleaseplease be in the Portland area...) -Cheese (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: Sneak preview Estuary Stronghold
|
|
(...) Eric, Godzilla sized kudos!! I like how you combined the different colored BURPS and all the different colored buildings - much better than all grey and black. How 'bout a close up of the circular design over the doorway of the grey building (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Fiber-optic connection between Scout & MicroScout
|
|
(...) Hey, wow! It turns out that the thin portions of the FO cables are the same thickness (or virtually the same, for all practical purposes) as the inside components of LEGO TECHNIC Flex System cables! In other words, not only do they fit nicely (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.scout, lugnet.robotics.microscout, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO Outlets are coming
|
|
Could you check with your source and see if they can be more specific than "Chicago"? Gurnee Mills or Woodfield maybe? Thanks, Julie (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Sneak preview Estuary Stronghold
|
|
(...) grey (...) it (...) Why don't you have a way? Many companies offer free sites to anyone, and the one I use (geocities) comes with a WYSIWYG, user-friendly editor. No HTML knowledge required. If scanning is the prob, send them to me (via (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Robots In Love?
|
|
Ok, I read it. The notation is extremely strained, and redefining X^Y to mean Y*X' (where X' is the underlying concept representing X) does not help. On the plus side, at least you figured out that orthogonal concepts need to be represented as a (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: 5801 ?
|
|
(...) Yes, it is, but I can still use it - I can cut it into either really small stickers, or cut out the whole sheet, then stick it on another (white) sticker. Even the stars can find some good uses by themselves. -Shiri (URL) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we have a Newsgroup for KIDLUG?
|
|
(...) OK, cool...looks like this has been fixed. (...) Oops, but this isn't fixed yet (still no ALT attribute). Please re-read the top few paragraphs at: (URL) You've also got a misteak in the third column of your table here: (URL) stands for: LEGO (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.org)
|
| |
| | Roller coaster track (was RE: Fiber-optic connection between Scout & MicroScout)
|
|
(...) Wow! Is this coincidence or what? I'm trying to build a rollercoaster with Lego. I've given up on making the track itself from Lego. Instead, I'm considering buying some smooth but flexible plastic tubes with similar dimensions as those ribbed (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Maybe you've all seen this already, but...
|
|
...this guys castles are fantastic. Good thing he's a doctor, otherwise he could never afford all those bricks! www.end.com/~jynx/castle Frederick. (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Sneak preview Estuary Stronghold
|
|
(...) Yeah, the "prob" is that I don't have a scanner or digital camera! How prehistoric!!! I feel like Fred Flintstone! Thanks for the offer, if I can get some good photos maybe I'll take you up on that, toda giveret. (...) So, what's up, you do (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Maybe you've all seen this already, but...
|
|
(...) Wowee! That is one heck of a site - too bad he doesn't have more pictures... -Shiri (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: The Lego Group
|
|
(...) Not anymore, actually. What was once: The LEGO Group [of Companies] is now simply: The LEGO Company even though TLC as a whole is still a multinational conglomerate. I believe the reasoning behind this transition finds its roots in TLC's (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Sentimental Journey (Was Re: What all has TLC done?)
|
|
(...) A bit, but I think we need to look at the history of the special purpose parts. Most of the earlier models had a few, which, IMO, were there to enhance the set. Nowadays, all parts seem to be this trend, which the special parts outnumber the (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | does anyone have...
|
|
...scans of the folowing: the old 4.5v/12v "track diagram template" the instructions to: 7865 7863 7862 7861 7860 7859 7858 7857 7856 7855 7854 5853 7852 7851 7850 Did these sets even come with instructions? -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general, lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Can they do like this?
|
|
(...) I guess the answer depends upon the domain name (I waffle just like a real lawyer :)). Clearly www.legos.com and www.lego.org would both be a problem using the "likelihood of confusion" test. Both of those domain names could draw internet (...) (26 years ago, 1-Feb-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
