 | | Re: Pulling power of different train systems —Mark Bellis
| | | | (...) Ben, with your rig, how does the 8866 PF Train motor compare with the 10153 motor, for various masses of loco (say no-load, kids' train load and AFOL train load)? I've tested the Emerald Night carriage with an 8866 motor and found that the (...) (14 years ago, 27-Nov-09, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Pulling power of different train systems —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke
| | | | | (...) Mark, sorriely I have broken down the small rig after the test series, so I have no quick access to a wider testing procedure..... (...) The speed of the Emerald is clearly much lower in comparison to 8866. If you run 8866 at a reduced speed (...) (14 years ago, 28-Nov-09, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Pulling power of different train systems —Benn Coifman
| | | | | (...) ... (...) This is an interesting discussion. Keep in mind that the 9v system was also designed for kids, which is why the motors have so little pulling power. Like you, I've looked at the 8866 and figured it would be of little use to me. But I (...) (14 years ago, 30-Nov-09, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Pulling power of different train systems —John Neal
| | | | | (...) Hey, Benn- I'll tell you what I'd like to see-- some third party coming in and dropping in beefier motors in the existing train motor. That would be cool. Come to think of it, didn't somebody actually try that? I've heard from those in the (...) (14 years ago, 30-Nov-09, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | |
