Subject:
|
Re: The Future of Trains
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Oct 2007 23:17:54 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
!
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
12726 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Eric Kingsley wrote:
| |
Minimally a battery powered system would have to pull a 6 wide consist of
10-12 cars for at least an hour to even be considered viable for a show. And
that doesn’t even address 8 wide (We have run both on our layouts).
|
The topic of battery life and pulling power came up today -
click here for that
thread. Hopefully it can address some of your concerns.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Well, it surprises me... but then again, I've just heard folks debate it, not actually test it or try it out. Thanks! I use 2500 mAh NiMH in my NXTs and RCXs, and I've been happy with them, but an 8 hour run time pulling 20 cars is... well, (...) (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| (...) Any idea how much weight was being pulled? 20 flatcars could be lighter than 20 boxcars. That amount of run time with that many cars does sound promising though. -Elroy (17 years ago, 3-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
| Well I posted this announcement at the (URL) site... Personally, I have to say that I have doubts that any battery powered system will meet the needs of clubs doing shows. Even a robust, rechargable battery system has considerable limitations. (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego)
|
124 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
