To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 5776
Subject: 
Torsen Differential
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:28:51 GMT
Viewed: 
2742 times
  
In case you've missed the recent discussions on lugnet.robotics, you should
check out the thread on a posi-traction differential:
http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/?n=16070

Or, more specifically, the message on a torsen differential someone built
with Lego parts:
http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/?n=16086

I only wish the people who post exclusively to robotics would cross-post to
Technic with stuff like this. I don't know about you, but I'm not into
robotics, yet :-), and I rarely read the group. Obviously, both groups can
greatly benefit from a discussion such as this.

TJ


Subject: 
Re: Torsen Differential
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:29:24 GMT
Viewed: 
2159 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Thomas (T. J.) Avery writes:

I only wish the people who post exclusively to robotics would cross-post to
Technic with stuff like this. I don't know about you, but I'm not into
robotics, yet :-), and I rarely read the group. Obviously, both groups can
greatly benefit from a discussion such as this.

This may be because they're posting from some other mailing list through the
gateway, and aren't able to cross-post. There's some info about this on the
main robotics page http://news.lugnet.com/robotics/

Regards

ROSCO

PS: Nice diff prototype!


Subject: 
Re: Torsen Differential
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:44:44 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
3788 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Thomas (T. J.) Avery writes:
In case you've missed the recent discussions on lugnet.robotics, you should
check out the thread on a posi-traction differential:

I only wish the people who post exclusively to robotics would cross-post to
Technic with stuff like this. I don't know about you, but I'm not into
robotics, yet :-), and I rarely read the group. Obviously, both groups can
greatly benefit from a discussion such as this.

TJ

Hi TJ,
Sorry about that. I can see how this is more of a Technic discussion. I
started this whole Torsen thing by responding to a post in the robotics
group. Next time I will re-direct it to Technic. Anyway, I took some
pictures of my Torsen diff models last night, and just finished updating my
page. Have a look!
http://www.ecf.utoronto.ca/~stehlik/torsen.html
This link goes right to the torsen page, but you can check out the rest of
my site with the navigation bar at the top of the page.
Rob


Subject: 
Re: Torsen Differential
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Sat, 8 Sep 2001 05:27:22 GMT
Viewed: 
3884 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Rob Stehlik writes:
In lugnet.technic, Thomas (T. J.) Avery writes:
In case you've missed the recent discussions on lugnet.robotics, you should
check out the thread on a posi-traction differential:

I only wish the people who post exclusively to robotics would cross-post to
Technic with stuff like this. I don't know about you, but I'm not into
robotics, yet :-), and I rarely read the group. Obviously, both groups can
greatly benefit from a discussion such as this.

TJ

Hi TJ,
Sorry about that. I can see how this is more of a Technic discussion. I
started this whole Torsen thing by responding to a post in the robotics
group. Next time I will re-direct it to Technic. Anyway, I took some
pictures of my Torsen diff models last night, and just finished updating my
page. Have a look!
http://www.ecf.utoronto.ca/~stehlik/torsen.html
This link goes right to the torsen page, but you can check out the rest of
my site with the navigation bar at the top of the page.
Rob

Once I saw the Torsen Differential on Brian's page
http://www.kiva.net/~alano/brian/torsen/

I also tried to make one based on the diff design on Mike Fusion's page
http://odin.prohosting.com/mrplanet/

Not surprisingly I ended up with one very similar to the one you made with a
few minor changes: I used <part:32069> instead of <part:32034> to support the
16t gear (I used an idle one but a regular one would be just as good).
That gives support to the gear from both sides and leaves some room for more
support between the two 40t gears. I hope I can post some pictures soon
(I don't have a digital camera so I'll have to scan some old fashion
photos...)

- David


Subject: 
Re: Torsen Differential
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Sun, 9 Sep 2001 15:24:38 GMT
Viewed: 
2553 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Rob Stehlik writes:
Hi TJ,
Sorry about that. I can see how this is more of a Technic discussion.

No problem. I've seen a lot of discussions on lugnet.robotics about Technic
parts and construction. I wouldn't say that they belong exclusively in
lugnet.technic, but rather in BOTH groups.

I realize there are a lot of people who read .technic and not .robotics, and
vice versa. However, both sides can benefit to discussions like these. I
guess in the future, I'll try to cross-post to .robotics when talking about
Technic parts and construction.

I started this whole Torsen thing by responding to a post in the robotics
group. Next time I will re-direct it to Technic. Anyway, I took some
pictures of my Torsen diff models last night, and just finished updating my
page. Have a look!
http://www.ecf.utoronto.ca/~stehlik/torsen.html
This link goes right to the torsen page, but you can check out the rest of
my site with the navigation bar at the top of the page.
Rob

Those are really good! I particularly like the diff. that uses the 40t
gears. Excellent work!

I'm going to have to go build one now.

TJ


Subject: 
Re: Torsen Differential
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Thu, 13 Sep 2001 22:22:47 GMT
Viewed: 
3982 times
  
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=6843

This is my version of a Torsen Differential based on the design on Mike
Fusion's page http://odin.prohosting.com/mrplanet/

I ended up with one very similar to the one made by Rob Stehlik with a few
changes: I used <part:32069> instead of <part:32034> to support the 16t gear.
That gives support to the gear from both sides and leaves some room for more
bracing between the two 40t gears.

- David


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR