Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Legends
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:25:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
745 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Selçuk Göre writes:
>
> Hmmm... Here is the list of MOL (my own legends):
>
> 856, 8855, 8859, 8860, 8862, 8868, 8880, 8448, 8460, and 8480
>
> and honorable mentions:
>
> 855, 8856, 8422, 8459, 8479
>
> But 8422, 8448, 8459, 8460, 8479 and 8480 are quite new to became a
> legend, so we can eliminate them. We can also eliminate the honorable
> mentions to reduce the pool, so the left are:
>
> 856, 8855, 8859, 8860, 8862, 8868, 8880
>
> I already own 8860, 8862, and 8880, so my personal choice of candidates
> are :
>
> 856, 8855, 8859, 8868
>
> 8855 has a unique propellor, 8868 has an older type 9V motor, 8859 has
> older engine cylinders (or engine squares..:-) which probably hard to
> manufacture again. So my personal choice and bet of a Lego Legend is:
>
> 856
>
> Am I boring or what?..:)
>
> Selçuk
>
> PS. If they manage to manufacture either old 9V motor or the 8855
> propellor, I of course prefer both 8855 and 8868 over 856.
All these numbers are very confusing, apart from 8462 I don't know the
numbers of any sets and can't be arsed to look them up. Can't people use the
proper names?
Steve
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: LEGO Legends
|
| (...) At least for me the numbers are easier. First of all that's the way I think about a set: I think: 853,8860,8865,8880,8448 and not: PKW, Auto Chassis, Test Car, Super Car, Super Car Mk II. The name could be very confusing - what's the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
| | | Re: LEGO Legends
|
| "Steven Lane" <Steveroblane@aol.com> wrote in message news:GErMIK.1Hn@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) Can't usually be arsed to look up the proper names for sets, and as I'm used to dutch names for sets I wouldn't know what americans call them. I (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
| | | Re: LEGO Legends
|
| (...) Steve, Where's the hassle cutting & pasting a few lines into the Lugnet search window? You get a nice picture of each set (usually) which is worth 1000 words. If you "can't be arsed to look them up", why should you expect others to aid your (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
| | | Re: LEGO Legends
|
| (...) Define proper in this context? The US name, the UK name, the Oz name, the german name, something else? A set number, with rare exception, is definitive and can be looked up by anyone that cares to make a small effort. So I would say that (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO Legends
|
| (...) Hmmm... Here is the list of MOL (my own legends): 856, 8855, 8859, 8860, 8862, 8868, 8880, 8448, 8460, and 8480 and honorable mentions: 855, 8856, 8422, 8459, 8479 But 8422, 8448, 8459, 8460, 8479 and 8480 are quite new to became a legend, so (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
46 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
