 | | | | | |
In lugnet.technic, Stump Dunn wrote:
| |
| |
We currently see axle pins in blue. Not black or any other color (the Tan
ones are a different part, that’s why they are a different color).
|
On this, i completely agree. They are two extremely similar parts, and I
believe colour standardisation is needed. However, blue and tan ?
Frictionless Axle pins were grey, Axle pins with friction were black. Easily
distinguishable, neutral colours. Why did they need to change ? For the sake
of 2M (lets not debate weather it should be 2M or 2L) axles and friction
pins> ? 2M axles at one point in time were produced in white. neutral,
easily distinguishable. All that is needed is for friction axle pins to be
made in something like dark grey and the other three parts could have
remained standard. Blue ? wheres the neutrality in that.
|
Dark Bley looks a lot like black in the instructions, I think that was the
thinking there. And I don’t know if white 2L(*) would be any better than red,
from a standing-out point of view.
So, maybe Light Bley for friction axle pins, and Tan for frictionless would have
worked. I’m sure they were looking for cheap colors, since the parts are so
abundant.
(*) I didn’t realize that was debatable. What’s the M stand for? Maybe we should
take this argument to another venue?
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.lego, Timothy P. Smith wrote:
| |
So, maybe Light Bley for friction axle pins, and Tan for frictionless would
have worked. I’m sure they were looking for cheap colors, since the parts are
so abundant.
|
I’m guessing they didn’t want to use lt grey because they don’t think kids can
easily distinguish pins and axle pins. “Standard” colour of frictionless pins is
lt grey.
ROSCO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
> I'm guessing they didn't want to use lt grey because they don't think kids can
> easily distinguish pins and axle pins. "Standard" colour of frictionless pins is
> lt grey.
Also, in the distant past TLC has actually produced the non friction
variety of axle pin in black (I own a few myself). Although that probably
doesn't matter to TLC :)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
(*) I didn’t realize that was debatable. What’s the M stand for? Maybe we
should take this argument to another venue?
|
“TECHNIC building uses the “module” or “M” as a measurement of length. 1 M is
the distance from the center of one hole on a TECHNIC beam to the center of the
next hole. ”
So a 3 L studless beam is actually 2M
Steve
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.technic, Stump Dunn wrote:
| |
| |
(*) I didn’t realize that was debatable. What’s the M stand for? Maybe we
should take this argument to another venue?
|
“TECHNIC building uses the “module” or “M” as a measurement of length. 1 M is
the distance from the center of one hole on a TECHNIC beam to the center of
the next hole. ”
So a 3 L studless beam is actually 2M
Steve
|
Ugh. Is that metric? And you only count center-to-center, not the ends?
Leave it Lego to think of something like this.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.technic, Timothy P. Smith wrote:
| |
In lugnet.technic, Stump Dunn wrote:
| |
| |
(*) I didn’t realize that was debatable. What’s the M stand for? Maybe we
should take this argument to another venue?
|
“TECHNIC building uses the “module” or “M” as a measurement of length. 1 M
is the distance from the center of one hole on a TECHNIC beam to the center
of the next hole. ”
So a 3 L studless beam is actually 2M
Steve
|
Ugh. Is that metric? And you only count center-to-center, not the ends?
Leave it Lego to think of something like this.
|
That can not be true. For example, if you look at page three of the lego
factory technic section, what we call a 1x3 liftarm thin is described as 3M.
--Peter
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
That can not be true. For example, if you look at page three of the lego
factory technic section, what we call a 1x3 liftarm thin is described as 3M.
--Peter
|
http://technic.lego.com/technicdesignschool/lesson.asp?x=x&id=1_a
Dont shoot the messenger !
Steve
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.technic, Stump Dunn wrote:
> Dont shoot the messenger!
Hmm. That would seem to imply that a 1x3 thin liftarm is, indeed, 3M long. Yes,
"M" is defined as the distance between two hole centers, but the length of the
piece can be cleanly read off the graph behind it - 3M.
--
Brian Davis
| | | | | | |
