Subject:
|
Re: mindstorms NXT
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:52:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7104 times
|
| |
|
|
On 1/5/06, Brian Davis wrote:
> I doubt it will be completely abandoned. After all, the first thing I want
> is
> to kludge a way to interface a NXT with and RCX, and use all my existing
> stuff.
> Even if LEGO makes it completely non-backwards-compatible, that doesn't mean
> we
> (AFOLs) will let it stay that way! Second, I wonder if this means FLL will try
> to switch. If so, great for the new product... if not, there will be at least
> some continued support.
I threw my name in as one of the 100 early testers (who here hasn't :)
and one of the questions was on FLL involvement, and a willingness to
write FLL documentation.
That leads me to think that they are definitely considering extending
the NXT to the FLL, though what that means to the schools with a large
investment already, I don't really know.
-Rob A>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: mindstorms NXT
|
| (...) The NXT FAQ addresses this question - it says that both the RCX and NXT will *both* be allowed in the 2006 FLL season. That should make for some very interesting decisions and comparisions. It also suggests to me that along with the MUPs we (...) (18 years ago, 8-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: mindstorms NXT
|
| (...) Don't worry, that has nothing to do with you being new to all this - we all are! Well, all but a luckey few... (...) I doubt it will be completely abandoned. After all, the first thing I want is to kludge a way to interface a NXT with and RCX, (...) (18 years ago, 6-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
223 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
