|
In lugnet.publish, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> To Mark P's point, I have not been taking the time to adjust folder
> placement, rightly or wrongly. I have just been approving or disapproving in
> order to get as many folders back on line as fast as I could. If there are
> particularly egregious examples, drop me (or any moderator) a note, and
> perhaps they will be corrected. I will try to do better going forward.
Ok, so the moderators can see what folder a picture was uploaded to? That is
a good thing! And they can move it from one folder to another? If so - COOL!
I am happy about this! But I saw the picture I linked to in another part of
this thread is gone. Does that mean that a mod took away its ok? Or it got
moved to another folder? Or the user deleted it?
I guess what I am trying to figure out is what powers the mods have? And how
does the process work? And what happens if a mod chooses not to ok a
picture? Does the user get an email or something?
Sorry for all the questions, I just think it would be nice if we knew how
things worked, and what we could do to make the mod job easier.
Mark P
http://www.landofbricks.com
|
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Mark Papenfuss writes:
> In lugnet.publish, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > To Mark P's point, I have not been taking the time to adjust folder
> > placement, rightly or wrongly. I have just been approving or disapproving in
> > order to get as many folders back on line as fast as I could. If there are
> > particularly egregious examples, drop me (or any moderator) a note, and
> > perhaps they will be corrected. I will try to do better going forward.
>
> Ok, so the moderators can see what folder a picture was uploaded to?
Yes, moderation happens at the folder level. Add one or more pictures to a
new or existing folder and it seems to mark the folder as needing review.
> That is
> a good thing! And they can move it from one folder to another? If so - COOL!
I do not think we have the power to MOVE pictures from folder to folder. All
we can do is edit the folder attributes as to what sort of folder it is, and
review it as safe, maybe, or unsafe.
if it gets set to safe the folder now becomes publicly visible via the
normal BrickShelf interface. If it gets set to unsure/maybe I THINK it gets
thrown back for re-moderation (I have seen ones I set to maybe come back
again) If it gets set to unsafe I do not know what happens then.
> I am happy about this! But I saw the picture I linked to in another part of
> this thread is gone. Does that mean that a mod took away its ok? Or it got
> moved to another folder? Or the user deleted it?
>
> I guess what I am trying to figure out is what powers the mods have? And how
> does the process work? And what happens if a mod chooses not to ok a
> picture? Does the user get an email or something?
Good questions. I don't know the answers.
> Sorry for all the questions, I just think it would be nice if we knew how
> things worked, and what we could do to make the mod job easier.
I speculate the following things would help: Don't delete and recreate
folders to rename/reorg them and don't add just one picture to a folder that
has a lot in it already. Not sure if those actually do help or not.
++Lar
|
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.publish, Mark Papenfuss writes:
> > In lugnet.publish, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> >
> > > To Mark P's point, I have not been taking the time to adjust folder
> > > placement, rightly or wrongly. I have just been approving or disapproving in
> > > order to get as many folders back on line as fast as I could. If there are
> > > particularly egregious examples, drop me (or any moderator) a note, and
> > > perhaps they will be corrected. I will try to do better going forward.
> >
> > Ok, so the moderators can see what folder a picture was uploaded to?
>
> Yes, moderation happens at the folder level. Add one or more pictures to a
> new or existing folder and it seems to mark the folder as needing review.
>
> > That is
> > a good thing! And they can move it from one folder to another? If so - COOL!
>
> I do not think we have the power to MOVE pictures from folder to folder. All
> we can do is edit the folder attributes as to what sort of folder it is, and
> review it as safe, maybe, or unsafe.
>
> if it gets set to safe the folder now becomes publicly visible via the
> normal BrickShelf interface. If it gets set to unsure/maybe I THINK it gets
> thrown back for re-moderation (I have seen ones I set to maybe come back
> again) If it gets set to unsafe I do not know what happens then.
>
> > I am happy about this! But I saw the picture I linked to in another part of
> > this thread is gone. Does that mean that a mod took away its ok? Or it got
> > moved to another folder? Or the user deleted it?
> >
> > I guess what I am trying to figure out is what powers the mods have? And how
> > does the process work? And what happens if a mod chooses not to ok a
> > picture? Does the user get an email or something?
>
> Good questions. I don't know the answers.
I DON'T think the user gets an email saying that the folder or conetnt of
the folder have been removed. I had 5 main folders in my top directory and
now only 4 are there. The 1st one was a bunch of .gsd files that when
merged together would give you a LEGO Invetory Application of mine. There
weher no images in this folder other than a tumbnail for the folder. I
guess these were deemed unsafe or un-somting because the entire folder has
been removed!
and I did not get any message in my email about it. I've been looking at my
other folders to see what else has gone bye-bye but need to look at my exlce
sheet to confirm that nothing else has been removed.
It would be nice to infor the user able deletions but I kow that this is on
the low end of things for now.
-AHui
> > Sorry for all the questions, I just think it would be nice if we knew how
> > things worked, and what we could do to make the mod job easier.
>
> I speculate the following things would help: Don't delete and recreate
> folders to rename/reorg them and don't add just one picture to a folder that
> has a lot in it already. Not sure if those actually do help or not.
>
> ++Lar
|
|
|