 | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) Ok since you hit on the moderation process and the massive backlog, would it be better if we didn't submit and new or updated images to Brickshelf at this time? I had some updated instructions I was going to post, but if it's going to cause (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) I have 2 question/comments... First I noticed that there seems to be newly uploaded files. Is this the case? I would think/hope that the old 150 thousand pictures be given the green light first before some new stuff gets added to the pile. How (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) it doesn't matter if you submit new pictures up - the way the moderation cgi works, it shows one of the (random) older folders first... so the new folders will just get added to the queue, but probably not get moderated until the older folders (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) Actually, the randomness is only to reduce the change of multiple moderators working on the same folder. The subset of folders that are randomized is selected from the newest folders. That way new stuff and old stuff get moderated. KL (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) sorry, my mistake. I thought you set it up to select from the oldest first, so that the backlog will eventually diminish...? Dan (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
