| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Eric Kingsley writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Seriously, without starting a big war, I think most of us know that you're a
> > bit spelling challenged, Eric.
I meant that in the nicest way, of course.
> You want a war I'll give you a war... ;-).
I think you left a comma out of that sentence fragment, big fella. :-)
All (1) kidding aside (I should have set followups to .fun on the last post
but they're set there now), I think if you don't want to be perfect in your
posts (not everyone can be me, after all (1)) you shouldn't have to be! This
is, afer all, a place to relax and have fun.
Everyone has to come to terms with the level they want to achieve in their
presentation, and what one sets as a standard for work may well be different
than when one is among friends, like here, especially when one is being
colloquial.
> I guess thats why I just design and code and leave documentation
> up to someone else.
Now that's scary! Programmers should document their own code, how can anyone
else know what it does? :-)
> > Still up, unless you count plane sleep, from when I typed the post you're
> > responding too, but about to call it a day.
I put a deliberate error in there for you to pounce on so you wouldn't feel
left out, but you missed it. :-)
1 - ok, most
++Lar
|
|
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Eric Kingsley writes:
> > I guess thats why I just design and code and leave documentation
> > up to someone else.
>
> Now that's scary! Programmers should document their own code, how can anyone
> else know what it does? :-)
Well I think you probably knew what I meant in that I leave final documentation
to someone else, i.e. the copy the customer sees, I have to document my code
for internal purposes of course.
>
> > > Still up, unless you count plane sleep, from when I typed the post you're
> > > responding too, but about to call it a day.
>
> I put a deliberate error in there for you to pounce on so you wouldn't feel
> left out, but you missed it. :-)
Well I am not sure but I think it was the "too". Ah the great English
language. We have to, too, and two and their, there, and they're the plural of
goose is geese but moose ain't meese. How anyone learning English as a second
language can ever figure it out I don't know. Heck I can't figure it out
sometimes.
Eric Kingsley
The New England LEGO Users Group
http://www.nelug.org/
|
|
|
