To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28507
Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 05:42:00 GMT
Highlighted: 
! (details)
Viewed: 
6941 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Allister McLaren wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
   Thanks to everyone for the support of our decision, may I wish you good luck in finding a new sandbox.

The only way that’s gonna happen is if I make it myself, but unfortunately I have neither the technical know-how nor the time to devote to such an enterprise.

Yeah, like it’s so hard. http://www.triple-bypass.net/jlug2/index.php

This is just a sample, and I’ve only put 15 minutes work into it.

worker201


Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:03:24 GMT
Viewed: 
6265 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leigh Holcombe wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Allister McLaren wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote:

  
   The only way that’s gonna happen is if I make it myself, but unfortunately I have neither the technical know-how nor the time to devote to such an enterprise.

Yeah, like it’s so hard. http://www.triple-bypass.net/jlug2/index.php

This is just a sample, and I’ve only put 15 minutes work into it.

worker201

Goodonya Leigh. Who knows what you could achieve in an hour. At this rate, we’ll have ITC by the end of the week.


Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:18:43 GMT
Viewed: 
6388 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leigh Holcombe wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Allister McLaren wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
   Thanks to everyone for the support of our decision, may I wish you good luck in finding a new sandbox.

The only way that’s gonna happen is if I make it myself, but unfortunately I have neither the technical know-how nor the time to devote to such an enterprise.

Yeah, like it’s so hard. http://www.triple-bypass.net/jlug2/index.php

This is just a sample, and I’ve only put 15 minutes work into it.

worker201

Nice work, CM Worker! (Or should I say CL Worker?)

Hopefully, my prompt registering will result in a low member number (not than numbers mean anything).

Spotlighted. Thanks for sharing.

Cheers

Richie Dulin

Future JLUG2 Community Overlooker


Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:07:58 GMT
Viewed: 
6567 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richie Dulin wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leigh Holcombe wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Allister McLaren wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
   Thanks to everyone for the support of our decision, may I wish you good luck in finding a new sandbox.

The only way that’s gonna happen is if I make it myself, but unfortunately I have neither the technical know-how nor the time to devote to such an enterprise.

Yeah, like it’s so hard. http://www.triple-bypass.net/jlug2/index.php

This is just a sample, and I’ve only put 15 minutes work into it.

worker201

Nice work, CM Worker! (Or should I say CL Worker?)

Hopefully, my prompt registering will result in a low member number (not than numbers mean anything).

Spotlighted. Thanks for sharing.

Cheers

Richie Dulin

Future JLUG2 Community Overlooker

Thanks for registering and all, guys. However, this is just a sample, and I’m not sure I’m the one to be administering or hosting a forum. I really just wanted to prove to Allister how quick and easy it was to set up a forum. Perhaps more discussion is warranted.


Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:29:31 GMT
Viewed: 
6830 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leigh Holcombe wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richie Dulin wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leigh Holcombe wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Allister McLaren wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
   Thanks to everyone for the support of our decision, may I wish you good luck in finding a new sandbox.

The only way that’s gonna happen is if I make it myself, but unfortunately I have neither the technical know-how nor the time to devote to such an enterprise.

Yeah, like it’s so hard. http://www.triple-bypass.net/jlug2/index.php

This is just a sample, and I’ve only put 15 minutes work into it.

worker201

Nice work, CM Worker! (Or should I say CL Worker?)

Hopefully, my prompt registering will result in a low member number (not than numbers mean anything).

Spotlighted. Thanks for sharing.

Cheers

Richie Dulin

Future JLUG2 Community Overlooker

Thanks for registering and all, guys. However, this is just a sample, and I’m not sure I’m the one to be administering or hosting a forum. I really just wanted to prove to Allister how quick and easy it was to set up a forum. Perhaps more discussion is warranted.

No. No discussion. Why not register us, and see how it goes? Will it collapse in a mountain of anticommunitarian trolling? Will you collapse under the admin load? I suspect neither. But carpe diem and all that. You have built it, they are coming.

But why not give it a go, just to see? Go on.

Besides, I am rather keen on getting a low member number.

Cheers

Richie Dulin

Future JLUG2 Unofficial CTOP List Administrator


Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:52:17 GMT
Viewed: 
6307 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leigh Holcombe wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Allister McLaren wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
   Thanks to everyone for the support of our decision, may I wish you good luck in finding a new sandbox.

The only way that’s gonna happen is if I make it myself, but unfortunately I have neither the technical know-how nor the time to devote to such an enterprise.

Yeah, like it’s so hard. http://www.triple-bypass.net/jlug2/index.php

This is just a sample, and I’ve only put 15 minutes work into it.

worker201

WOW,

CL worker, you ARE a RATTC!

the list of people who have registered is VERY impressive. Kudo’s to you, and your new team.

as a side note, and I am NOT a lawyer, but i think you might need permission from CL janey, and/or CL ross to use the JLUG moniker.

I’m sure you could try CTOP - or, ummm, SANDBOX.

Chris with all PROOF gone, i can now say i was JLUG member # 2


Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:13:16 GMT
Viewed: 
6747 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leigh Holcombe wrote:

   Thanks for registering and all, guys. However, this is just a sample, and I’m not sure I’m the one to be administering or hosting a forum. I really just wanted to prove to Allister how quick and easy it was to set up a forum. Perhaps more discussion is warranted.

Setting up is one thing. Maintaining and administering? ...

Well, you’ll see.

Allister


Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:35:27 GMT
Viewed: 
6959 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Allister McLaren wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leigh Holcombe wrote:

   Thanks for registering and all, guys. However, this is just a sample, and I’m not sure I’m the one to be administering or hosting a forum. I really just wanted to prove to Allister how quick and easy it was to set up a forum. Perhaps more discussion is warranted.

Setting up is one thing. Maintaining and administering? ...

Well, you’ll see.

Allister

I’d be satisfied with chat. I’ll create a #jlug IRC channel on espernet but I seem to remember some of you have troubles getting in during work hours.

Tim


Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:29:07 GMT
Viewed: 
6590 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leigh Holcombe wrote:
   Thanks for registering and all, guys. However, this is just a sample, and I’m not sure I’m the one to be administering or hosting a forum. I really just wanted to prove to Allister how quick and easy it was to set up a forum. Perhaps more discussion is warranted.

I think you may have unleashed a beast ;-)

tim


Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:03:21 GMT
Viewed: 
7232 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:

   I’d be satisfied with chat. I’ll create a #jlug IRC channel on espernet but I seem to remember some of you have troubles getting in during work hours.

Tim

I seem to be able to penetrate through to the one they use on mechahub, but irc, iirc, is a no-go area for me. :(


Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:11:23 GMT
Viewed: 
7213 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Allister McLaren wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote:

   I’d be satisfied with chat. I’ll create a #jlug IRC channel on espernet but I seem to remember some of you have troubles getting in during work hours.

Tim

I seem to be able to penetrate through to the one they use on mechahub, but irc, iirc, is a no-go area for me. :(

If you can get through to the mechahub one you can get through to #jlug. Come in and I’ll tell you how.

Tim


Subject: 
Re: JLUG - The Forum that WAS.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:32:24 GMT
Viewed: 
6883 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richie Dulin wrote:

   No. No discussion. Why not register us, and see how it goes? Will it collapse in a mountain of anticommunitarian trolling? Will you collapse under the admin load? I suspect neither.

My reference to meant collapsing under the admin load is not meant to be insulting toward CL Ross and Mistress Janey. They did do a lot of work behind the scenes.

In fact, some of the things they delivered were the most wizard that I’ve seen in any online LEGO forum. But perhaps some of the things like s’lighting, the LPV and MOT galleries, jugstars, the automatic deacrynoming of CTOPs, the cute smilies and so on were a bit too much of an overhead. Wherever did they get the ideas for such features?

So, kudos to CL Ross and Mistress Janey for what they achieved.

Cheers

Richie Dulin
JLUG2 Community Overlooker


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR