To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27825
     
   
Subject: 
Re: 2nd Joe Vig contest entry - How Joe learned to stop worrying and love the bomb
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:10:37 GMT
Viewed: 
3937 times
  

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Marc Nelson Jr. wrote: SNIP

Marc, I will endeavor to be as simple as I can in my reply, I hope you will be able to read deeply into the answers, as short as they are.

  
Did you post this message because you are “saddened”,


Yes.

   or because you wanted to take a shot at Lenny?

YES.

(best 6 year old voice I can muster)

HE started it!!!!

(end best 6 year old voice I can muster)


   If you don’t like the contest sponsors’ ruling, then do something helpful, like John Neal did.

If I had one of those heads I would have also made an offer. After the first offer was made, any further offers would be moot.

   Or maybe sponsor your own contest - one without rules, perhaps?


I routinely hold contests with many lose and vague rules, all with the guidance of a simple phrase “Spirit of the game.”

Ergo, to see other strict rule enforcement within the WEC made me “sad.”

   Why all the outrage over the fact that a contest has rules and that those rules were enforced? The response is especially inexplicable given that the situation seemed to have been resolved quite nicely before it was taken up as a cause celebre.

Marc Nelson Jr.



There was no “outrage,” I simply said I was “saddened” then promptly forwarded this to O.T.D. to show my respect to the forum, and contest. The outrage happened when people reply to my post with sarcasm.

If you want sarcasm just let me know.

Chris

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: 2nd Joe Vig contest entry - How Joe learned to stop worrying and love the bomb
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:31:09 GMT
Viewed: 
4083 times
  

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Chris Magno wrote:

<snip>

.

If you want sarcasm just let me know.

Chris

Me!  Me!  Me!!!  I want sarcasm!!!!!!

If it was my contest, and only if it was my contest, I would have stated in 'da
rulz' that Joe Vig has to be composed of such'n such colour of torso, legs, and
use Ron's head.

*However*, I would have also specified that, in lieu of Ron's head, you could
use the classic smilie face 'cause that's all there was from '78 until a few
years back--and if people stopped pruchasing LEGO in the past decade, they would
not have had any minifig head besides the classic smilie face.

See, the torsos and legs that make up Joe Vig have been around since mini-figs
began.  Ron's head--not so much.  I think that's a legitimate consideration.

Sure, Ron's head is easily purchased from Bricklink (or given, as John so
wonderfully demonstrated).  That said, 20ish years of 1 smilie face should also
be deemed sufficient.

But that's just me.

Dave K

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: 2nd Joe Vig contest entry - How Joe learned to stop worrying and love the bomb
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 17:35:23 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
4000 times
  

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:

*However*, I would have also specified that, in lieu of Ron's head, you could
use the classic smilie face 'cause that's all there was from '78 until a few
years back--and if people stopped pruchasing LEGO in the past decade, they would
not have had any minifig head besides the classic smilie face.


I stopped purchasing Lego before 1978, and I *demand* to be able to
submit a Joe Vig contest entry using my blank-faced and armless old
minifigs. With a police hat, not the fancy brown male hair from 1979.

I also see the need for an alternative using only regular bricks to
build Joe, in case someone stopped purchasing Lego before the early
1970's and feels left out.

We also need rules for a 2:1 scale 16x16 vig where you don't need
to have access to the fancy new 1xN slim bricks introduced in the
sixties.

Seriously, I doubt that anyone on Lugnet has *stopped* buying Lego.
I did stop before 1978, but I soon started again, when Technic
took off and became a good excuse to keep buying.
In my opinion, a vignette entry and any other public posting is
a good and welcome *reason* to buy a few extra pieces.

But I can quit any time I want. Really. Just not right now.

 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR