Subject:
|
Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.mediawatch
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Dec 2001 16:08:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1786 times
|
| |
|
|
> > Agreed!!! If something has explicit sexual content, you should, at the very
> > least have a age verification page. (click only if over 18, or whatever.
> > It's not much but better than nothing.)
>
> Wait a minute! Kissing is (or often is) sexual. When twelve year olds hold
> hands at the mall, that's sexual too. Sexual describes a huge range of
> behaviors, the vast majority of which are healthy.
>
> Why should age verification take place?
>
> Chris
Read that again, "explicit sexual content" Explicit; that means clearly
defined. In this case the sexual act itself which is what we are discussing.
Age verification has become somewhat standardized across the internet.
(some of it by law, some voluntary) If it has content that has been
objected to by the majority, and one should have the intelligence to know
what that is, there is a responsibility to notify viewers of said content.
Mark
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
