MediaWatch : 422


MediaWatch / 422	421 \| 423

Subject:	Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
Newsgroups:	lugnet.mediawatch
Date:	Sat, 22 Dec 2001 14:05:13 GMT
Viewed:	1783 times

In lugnet.mediawatch, Mark Neumann writes: > > Really? Maybe there isn't. Maybe you should do what adult sites do and • require > > some adult ID check before people can enter your site. That would be the > > responsible thing to do. > > Agreed!!! If something has explicit sexual content, you should, at the very > least have a age verification page. (click only if over 18, or whatever. > It's not much but better than nothing.) Wait a minute! Kissing is (or often is) sexual. When twelve year olds hold hands at the mall, that's sexual too. Sexual describes a huge range of behaviors, the vast majority of which are healthy. Why should age verification take place? Chris

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
(...) Read that again, "explicit sexual content" Explicit; that means clearly defined. In this case the sexual act itself which is what we are discussing. Age verification has become somewhat standardized across the internet. (some of it by law, (...) (22 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
(...) .... (...) Your opinion, and entitled to it, however it is also your choice to participate. Or to allow those you are responsible for knowing whether they should participate. (...) I think Lego was right in making a statement, however I think (...) (22 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search