MediaWatch : 395


MediaWatch / 395	394 \| 396

Subject:	Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
Newsgroups:	lugnet.mediawatch
Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2001 04:34:05 GMT
Viewed:	1709 times

> In lugnet.mediawatch, Curt Tigges writes: > I am shocked and disgusted at anyone who would be immoral and low enough to > display these films on the Internet. Even though I have not watched them, I > have learned enough reading this thread. Maybe you should check it out first, Curt, so you can at least understand the CONTEXT of the images presented? Just a suggestion. I haven't seen it yet either (because my computer is sssssslooooooowwww so I rarely see anything animated) but I want to judge for myself. > It is not right for anyone to display this trash anywhere. How do you know it's trash if you haven't even seen it? > Legos were not meant to be used in digital films filled with smut, they were >meant for enhancing creativity through building and designing. I'm with you, Curt, but what is smut? Who decides? Back in the days on the "I Love Lucy" show, they didn't even dare to show Lucy and Ricky, a married couple, in their bed together. > I hope nobody flames me for this, but if they do, I will still stand by my >opinions. No flames here, Curt. You've got a right to speak your mind. All I suggest is taking a look at the stuff first and then tell us what you think and why. Better to know specifically what you're condemning rather than follow the crowd or someone else's interpretation of something. People see things differently, trust your own eyes and heart :) Peace, Dan

Message has 3 Replies:

		Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
I'm with Dan on this, I'd love to see this stuff myself but my 56k works agains me when downloading animation. I actually have the impression that this "smut" may actually have been done tastefully... but I may never know for myself. (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)

		Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
(...) Dan, while I'll agree with you on most points in your post, I still don't think that allowing a 14 year old to view smut (even in the ABS) is acceptible. The films (and other sites of this nature) are there for adult viewing and adult viewing (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)

		Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
(...) You're probably right, Dan. I might have been a little too vehement in stating my opinions without watching the film, but the very idea that someone would do this using LEGOs appalls me. (...) That also is a good point. I believe that what (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
I am shocked and disgusted at anyone who would be immoral and low enough to display these films on the Internet. Even though I have not watched them, I have learned enough reading this thread. It is not right for anyone to display this trash (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.mediawatch)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search