 | | | | | |
| |
“HOLY CARP, ERIC DIDNT POST IN THE RIGHT FORUM,LETS USE THIS AS AN EXCUSE TO
DESTROY HIM BECAUSE WE DONT LIKE HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!”
|
More like “HOLY CARP, FOR THE SECOND TIME ERIC POSTED AN AD WHERE HE SHOULDN’T
EVEN THOUGH HE’S BEEN ASKED NOT TO BEFORE!!!!!!!!!!!”
The not liking him is a side issue. There are plenty of people posting here who
have no issues with Eric but who still don’t want him to breech the ToS.
| |
See, this is what happens when you roll the dice and don’t have any
moderation. You have people posting in the wrong forum, putting up profanity,
and there always has to be some kind of uproar or termoil in order to get
something done.
|
Actually that’s more like what happens when people refuse to play fair. Let’s
not avoid the fact that ERIC HAS DONE THIS BEFORE AND BEEN TOLD OFF FOR IT...
not by me or any of his perceived (or otherwise) enemies but by a totally
neutral party.
| |
I suggest Lugnet grows a sack, gets some fair moderators, and actually rules
this place like a forum with a sense of order. You all have proven you can’t
co-habitate because of the chidish activity that flares up on a semi-monthly
basis as Lugnet’s declining post per day ratio continues to plummet.
|
Your suggestion has been noted.
| |
My 29,000 members on BZP don’t act like this, and its because they know there
is a certain decorum at BZP that is to be upheld and respected. Lugnet lacks
that, and it needs it badly.
|
I have no problem with moderation but I’m not keen on frequenting anywhere with
it. I know I’m not alone in this given the growing membership of jlug.
| |
Look, I am not taking sides either way on this, but I find the selective
enforcement of the rules by mass-hysteria here disgusting, and its a shame
that it is allowed to happen.
|
What selective enforcement? Could you point out where I or anyone else
complaining about Eric’s beaviour have consciously ignored such a severe breach
before?
| |
I just hope you start moving topics and enforcing policy for everyone, not
just the people you have deemed targets.
|
See above point.
| |
That is all. Back to my corner of the LEGO world.
Rex
bzpower.com
owner
admin
|
I’m glad you made your opinion known. Please come again and post next time there
is something you don’t like. I hear that really makes for a positive forum.
Tim
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Timothy Gould yak yaked:
You and others are being selective.
When I witnessed foul language on LUGNET, no one said anything.
When I see other people's images being molested, no one said anything.
When a posting issue takes place, you all jump on. Whateva.
The TOS you and others quote has a loophole that you all have interpreted to
suit your poor attitudes.
e
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Eric Sophie wrote:
| |
In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Timothy Gould yak yaked:
You and others are being selective.
When I witnessed foul language on LUGNET, no one said anything.
When I see other people’s images being molested, no one said anything.
When a posting issue takes place, you all jump on. Whateva.
The TOS you and others quote has a loophole that you all have interpreted to
suit your poor attitudes.
e
|
How many times does it have to be explained to you before it seeps into that
drug soaked blancmange you use for a brain?
Read the thread again. The only poor attitude here is yours, Eric. The sooner
you realise that, the better off we will all be.
But, by all means continue with your insane ramblings. I for one find posts like
the ‘Evil Oppressors’ one hugely entertaining.
Allister
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Eric Sophie wrote:
I guess that’d be the view from inside said defective organ.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Click to support
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Eric Sophie wrote:
Hmmm... tough one.
Every time you piss someone off on Lugnet you add another fig to the jar?
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Allister McLaren wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Eric Sophie wrote:
Hmmm... tough one.
Every time you piss someone off on Lugnet you add another fig to the jar?
|
Nah... It’s obviously some evil voodoo witchcraft thing. Maybe that prominent
archer fig without his pants is you... Everyone knows that The secret of Captain
Underpant’s powers lie in his underpants, after all.
Legoswami
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Eric Sophie wrote:
| |
In lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, Timothy Gould yak yaked:
You and others are being selective.
When I witnessed foul language on LUGNET, no one said anything.
When I see other people’s images being molested, no one said anything.
When a posting issue takes place, you all jump on. Whateva.
The TOS you and others quote has a loophole that you all have interpreted to
suit your poor attitudes.
e
|
What you have there aren’t examples. An example is where you refer to something
that happened. eg. this is an example of
Rich Manzo’s attitude to Lugnet, this is an example of your flagrant disregard for the ToS and
this is an example of me
being an ass (as in the donkey, not the swearword, I spell the other one with an
r and an e) to you.
I didn’t jump in. I posted the first response. And if I hadn’t I’m sure someone
else would have soon enough. Besides, this is NOT THE POINT. The point is you
did something wrong. Whether “your enemies” are out to get you is totally
irrelevant. YOU DID SOMETHING WRONG.
So when you talk about poor attitude, look at yourself before looking at others.
The proportion of responses in this thread from people who aren’t your “evil
oppressors” should give you cause for concern. If it doesn’t then I’m afraid you
will never again have my sympathy regardless of how badly other people treat
you.
Tim
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Whateva, you still suck.
e
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Eric Sophie wrote:
> Whateva, you still suck.
>
> e
By posting it in .geek are you implying Tim is a geek or are you trying to defy
us evil oppressors again by posting it in the wrong group?
Just asking.
Legoswami
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Samarth Moray wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Eric Sophie wrote:
> > Whateva, you still suck.
> >
> > e
>
> By posting it in .geek are you implying Tim is a geek or are you trying to defy
> us evil oppressors again by posting it in the wrong group?
>
> Just asking.
>
> Legoswami
No, you suck too.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Eric Sophie wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Samarth Moray wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Eric Sophie wrote:
> > > Whateva, you still suck.
> > >
> > > e
> >
> > By posting it in .geek are you implying Tim is a geek or are you trying to defy
> > us evil oppressors again by posting it in the wrong group?
> >
> > Just asking.
> >
> > Legoswami
>
> No, you suck too.
Is that a 'no' to the first statement, second or both?
Legoswami
| | | | | | |
