To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.licensed.batmanOpen lugnet.licensed.batman in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Licensed / Batman / 19
     
   
Subject: 
Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.licensed.batman, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:02:11 GMT
Viewed: 
17314 times
  

--snip--

   Batman as a theme in general touches on some pretty dark themes that probably aren’t appropriate for children. I’ve often wondered how toy companies in general can justifiably market products aimed at children based on movies with a clear MA rating (or even PG13) eg. Revenge of the Sith, Batman Begins, Spiderman 3 etc. Obviously I’ve got outmoded ideas about the principles of toy design.

Allister

I don’t think it can be quite so simple though. A lot of films are MA or PG13 (which any child can see if their parents take them IIRC) because of ‘bad language’ or nudity, neither of which are likely to make it to the toy product.

With children’s toys based directly on a single film with an MA rating your argument would stand up but I don’t think LEGO have released anything like this (probably most children’s toy companies wouldn’t because it would be unlikely to profit).

However, if you consider LEGO’s main licenses we have: Batman (most Batman sources are suitable for children eg. 60s tv show, comics, some films), Spiderman 1 and 2 films (PG13 for both films) and Star Wars (I believe these range from G to PG13). In each case there’s a good chance that children from all but the most protected family environments will have seen the films or some related source material.

Tim

   
         
     
Subject: 
Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Fri, 8 Jun 2007 18:24:54 GMT
Viewed: 
6401 times
  

In lugnet.licensed.batman, Timothy Gould wrote:
  
I don’t think it can be quite so simple though. A lot of films are MA or PG13 (snip) because of ‘bad language’ or nudity, neither of which are likely to make it to the toy product.

Which can be a bummer IYAM ;-)




   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.licensed.batman, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Sat, 9 Jun 2007 20:17:04 GMT
Viewed: 
17298 times
  

In lugnet.licensed.batman, Timothy Gould wrote:
   However, if you consider LEGO’s main licenses we have: Batman (most Batman sources are suitable for children eg. 60s tv show, comics, some films), Spiderman 1 and 2 films (PG13 for both films) and Star Wars (I believe these range from G to PG13).

Loathing him as I do, I can’t speak for the Spiderman films, but I’d say that the 60’s Batman tv show isn’t suitable for viewing by anyone. Also, in the US the Star Wars films have all received a PG rating with the exception of RotS which stands out as the only PG-13 episode, and one that Lucas himself has specifically said isn’t really intended to be viewed by the full range of ages as the previous five installments were, due to the much darker themes that were necessarily going to be explored with the destruction of the Jedi order and the fall of the Republic. They even had to make some minor tweaks going into the Special Editions (recutting certain scenes so you never actually saw naked-faced human officers and Death Star Troopers getting hit with blaster bolts...though it was perfectly okay when it came to armor-clad Stormtroopers and their more specialized cousins the Snowtroopers and Scout Troopers).

 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR