 | | | | | |
Ben writes:
> I only have used this word, because in the posting before this word has been
> used by YOU (and against me)! You told me to have feelings of greed. So your
> arguing now is a little unfair in my eyes...
Actually, Ben, I think you mean me -- I used the word first.
There are two Richards underfoot at this point -- the best way to tell the
difference between us is that the other Richard is younger and better
looking than I am.
=oP
-- Hop-Frog
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Richard Marchetti writes:
> Ben writes:
> > I only have used this word, because in the posting before this word has been
> > used by YOU (and against me)! You told me to have feelings of greed. So your
> > arguing now is a little unfair in my eyes...
>
> Actually, Ben, I think you mean me -- I used the word first.
>
> There are two Richards underfoot at this point -- the best way to tell the
> difference between us is that the other Richard is younger and better
> looking than I am.
Thanks for jumping in, HopFrog.
And sorry to Richard Noeckel. My fault - I mixed up the two names....
Kind Regards,
Ben
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Richard Marchetti writes:
> There are two Richards underfoot at this point
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke writes:
> And sorry to Richard Noeckel. My fault - I mixed up the two names....
Man, do I ever feel despondent…
I've been here for over 2 years and I'm
still second-string to the ‘other’ Richard…
(no matter how much he likes me) ;)
~After all, we’ve got two totally different signatures:
Mr. Marchetti has the clever, witty, yet sarcastic -- Hop-Frog as his sign.
While I possess the characterful, dynamic, original --==RïçhårÐ==-- as mine.
*You’d think I'd be easily picked out with my use of:
#1. Lively ACII characters; ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ ~ Æ Å 2¢ ¥ £ € $ § ‹± ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸
#2. The way I artfully lop-off the end of a ‘G.’
(For example:)
Havin’
Thinkin’
Tryin’
Cryin’
#3. The way I throw in archaic forms of old-speak to infer a measure
of flavor/dialect.
(For example:)
Mayhaps t’would
‘tis betwixt
Thou hast
Prithee
Durst
Wilt
And all this is seamlessly intertwined into a majikal potpourri of flowing
verse…
<Sarcasm On>
But I guess once you’ve spoken to one ‘Richard’ you’ve spoken to ‘em all,
I Have No Identity,
Product classification 7 of 12 tuchiarea adjuction of uni-matrix 01
--==RïçhårÐ==--
7 of 9: "Do not engage us in further irrelevant discourse"
__ ____ ____ ___
( ) ( __) / __)_ / \
| |__ | E__ ( (_ / _) ( O )
(_____) (____) \____/ \___/
Y’know I'm just playin’ … right?
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
In lugnet.people, Richard Noeckel writes:
> > In lugnet.lego.direct, Richard Marchetti writes:
> > There are two Richards underfoot at this point
>
> > In lugnet.lego.direct, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke writes:
> > And sorry to Richard Noeckel. My fault - I mixed up the two names....
>
> Man, do I ever feel despondent…
> I've been here for over 2 years and I'm
> still second-string to the ‘other’ Richard…
> (no matter how much he likes me) ;)
You've been here for two years already? Good Lord am I old.
> ~After all, we’ve got two totally different signatures:
>
> Mr. Marchetti has the clever, witty, yet sarcastic -- Hop-Frog as his sign.
> While I possess the characterful, dynamic, original --==RïçhårÐ==-- as mine.
That may be why you're second-fiddle. Too many people keep
trying to pronounce that...thing.
> *You’d think I'd be easily picked out with my use of:
>
> #1. Lively ACII characters; ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ ~ Æ Å 2¢ ¥ £ € $ § ‹± ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸
>
> #2. The way I artfully lop-off the end of a ‘G.’
> (For example:)
> Havin’
> Thinkin’
> Tryin’
> Cryin’
>
> #3. The way I throw in archaic forms of old-speak to infer a measure
> of flavor/dialect.
> (For example:)
> Mayhaps t’would
> ‘tis betwixt
> Thou hast
> Prithee
> Durst
> Wilt
Durst is supposedly musical, and Wilt is worth ten thousand....
nevermind.fnord
> And all this is seamlessly intertwined into a majikal potpourri of flowing
> verse…
>
> <Sarcasm On>
> But I guess once you’ve spoken to one ‘Richard’ you’ve spoken to ‘em all,
You forgot about eyeball-biting monkeys™, Stubbies™, and head-stepping.
Or is it bad form to admit that's what I identify you most closely with?
Also, your rants are markedly different from the other Richards' (yes,
there are more Richards beneath you as well). Have no fear--some kinds
of notoriety you may not, in fact, will.
best
LFB
| | | | | | |
