To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.harrypotterOpen lugnet.harrypotter in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Harry Potter / 995
     
   
Subject: 
Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 21:05:53 GMT
Viewed: 
2842 times
  

In lugnet.harrypotter, Mark Rideout writes:
http://www.suave.net/~dave/staircompare.html

So for clarification on the findings, 4706 does\can have a random defective
part in it. I have a least one on the set that I have (Richard Marchetti
also found one in his). It is not specific to 4709.

I see that David Wertz reported one in his copy of 4706 (
http://news.lugnet.com/harrypotter/?n=993 ), but also Richard? I must have
missed his post to that effect...

Too bad it's in both sets :( I had hoped it would only be specific to one...

DaveE

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 21:19:45 GMT
Viewed: 
2937 times
  

In lugnet.harrypotter, David Eaton writes:
In lugnet.harrypotter, Mark Rideout writes:
http://www.suave.net/~dave/staircompare.html

So for clarification on the findings, 4706 does\can have a random defective
part in it. I have a least one on the set that I have (Richard Marchetti
also found one in his). It is not specific to 4709.

I see that David Wertz reported one in his copy of 4706 (
http://news.lugnet.com/harrypotter/?n=993 ), but also Richard? I must have
missed his post to that effect...

Too bad it's in both sets :( I had hoped it would only be specific to one...

DaveE

I have not idea why I said Richard. Yes it was David - I was looking at the
wrong post when I check to see who it was from.

-mark

   
         
   
Subject: 
Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general
Date: 
Fri, 21 Dec 2001 05:12:49 GMT
Viewed: 
2955 times
  

I just purchased 7 sets of stairs from the 4709 set and all the stairs were OK

I purchased 2 sets before that but they were not built so I could comfirm.
It seem to me that the majority of bad stairs are in the smaller set.

Its totally random. Mine averaged about 4.6 bad stairs per staircase! in the
smaller sets!

I'll let you know when the package arrives with the return address to Lego.
They already ordered my 98 stairs and are waiting to examine them on return.
I really hope more people will call them as this will clearly show them the
problem!

I love the stairs, wished the could be fixed in place but other than that
will save me a lot of brick making spiral stairs!.

I wish everyone the same results through S@H, and I can't see why not?
Somehow, somewhere the made the mistak and now they need to fix it! :-)

Doyle Nelson

 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR