Subject:
|
Re: Color Change - Final Update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 May 2004 16:27:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10562 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote:
> Agreed, and if you stand around me in person more than 10 minutes, you'll
> probably hear at least 3 big "thank you!" for that.
>
> But I don't think I did a good job of explaining my point. I'm not saying
> that AFOLs are not worth listening to. I'm saying that I don't understand the
> original point about how TLC might be "using" the AFOL feedback to further
> goals with other audiences (aside from implementing the AFOL feedback, which
> leads to product enhancements for general audience products).
Ah, I see now. You were trying to say that the only market that cares strictly
about the commitment to listen to AFOL feedback is the AFOL market itself, which
I can agree with. Noone else has any reason to care why you did something so
much as they do about what you actually did. The way I read it, however, was
that the only market that ever benefits from the actual implementation of AFOL
advice is the AFOL market, which is not true, as AFOLs often pass on feedback
from the general consumer market.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Color Change - Final Update
|
| (...) Agreed, and if you stand around me in person more than 10 minutes, you'll probably hear at least 3 big "thank you!" for that. But I don't think I did a good job of explaining my point. I'm not saying that AFOLs are not worth listening to. I'm (...) (20 years ago, 6-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
260 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
