| |
In lugnet.general, Thomas P. Rafert writes:
> Here you go. Quality isn't the greatest but you can read it.
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=501
Tom,
Thank you for this. Thank you very much.
Do you see anywhere in any fine print on that page or any other page noting
that LUGNET and the LUGNET logo are trademarks of LUGNET and/or its owners?
--Todd
|
|
| |
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> Do you see anywhere in any fine print on that page or any other page noting
> that LUGNET and the LUGNET logo are trademarks of LUGNET and/or its owners?
AWAKIANALBASOTI [1], but I think that this use is a) within fair use and b)
cool and fun. It's not really a mention -- rather, a little reference in the
background. Those of us who know what it is will think it's cool, and those
who don't will not notice/care. Perhaps a few will try to figure out what it
is, but I don't think that the sort of person likely to do that is the sort
of person likely to be confused.
'Course, it woulda been nicer if someone would have asked Todd/Suz first,
but my guess is that it wasn't done as an official decision, but rather
something put in by an artist with the intention of making a pleasant
surprise.
[1] as we all know i am not a lawyer by any stretch of the imagination
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
| |
In lugnet.general mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) wrote:
> Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> > Do you see anywhere in any fine print on that page or any other page noting
> > that LUGNET and the LUGNET logo are trademarks of LUGNET and/or its owners?
>
> AWAKIANALBASOTI [1], but I think that this use is a) within fair use and b)
> cool and fun. It's not really a mention -- rather, a little reference in the
> background. Those of us who know what it is will think it's cool, and those
> who don't will not notice/care. Perhaps a few will try to figure out what it
> is, but I don't think that the sort of person likely to do that is the sort
> of person likely to be confused.
>
> 'Course, it woulda been nicer if someone would have asked Todd/Suz first,
> but my guess is that it wasn't done as an official decision, but rather
> something put in by an artist with the intention of making a pleasant
> surprise.
IHTAOTLAILMUNAOTF [1], I think its cool, but there is a minor concern
on the asking Todd first deal. If they put some fine print in it
would be better too. I wish they would boldy come out and promote
Lugnet though... It'll get there in time, TLG is moving in the right
direction.
[1] I'd have to agree on these lines, and I love making up new
acronyms on the fly
-Tim
http://www.zacktron.com
http://www.ldraw.org
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
|
|
| |
Todd Lehman wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Thank you for this. Thank you very much.
>
> Do you see anywhere in any fine print on that page or any other page noting
> that LUGNET and the LUGNET logo are trademarks of LUGNET and/or its owners?
>
> --Todd
Your welcome Todd. I was surprised I was the first to mention it, I normally
get mine after everyone else.
I saw Larry answered you questions about the trademarks issue. Same
observations here, even with a magnifying glass, nope nothing.
Tom
|
|
|
