| |
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:44:01AM +0000, Hakan Tandogan wrote:
> Did anyone compile the inventories that were posted here
> in a machine-readable format, possibly even integrating it with
> the data from set inventories at lugnet? I'd really like to continue
> the work of Tim Vattima.
>
> Wouldn't it be wonderful if the Set guide contained links
> to the (existing) set inventories? I intend to spend a few days
> during Christmas with a database / search engine on my home server;
> but I could also contribute my programming skills (and those few
> days ;-) ) to lugnet.
well, we started creating something similar, but didn't import any external
data yet:
http://www.peeron.com/inv
:)
Dan
|
|
| |
Dan Boger <dan@wwind.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:44:01AM +0000, Hakan Tandogan wrote:
> > Did anyone compile the inventories that were posted here
> > in a machine-readable format, possibly even integrating it with
> > the data from set inventories at lugnet? I'd really like to continue
> > the work of Tim Vattima.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be wonderful if the Set guide contained links
> > to the (existing) set inventories? I intend to spend a few days
> > during Christmas with a database / search engine on my home server;
> > but I could also contribute my programming skills (and those few
> > days ;-) ) to lugnet.
>
> well, we started creating something similar, but didn't import any external
> data yet:
>
> http://www.peeron.com/inv
Yep, that's just what I meant... With Lugnet, you and me,
we will have three distinct implementations of the same functionality.
I think we *really* should throw our efforts together to create
*one* implementation (which could coincidentally be hosted on
lugnet).
But then again, just about everyone has his or her own
implementation of sets -> htmlpages ;-)
Regards,
Hakan
--
"Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"
|
|
| |
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 03:12:48PM +0000, Hakan Tandogan wrote:
> Dan Boger <dan@wwind.com> writes:
> > well, we started creating something similar, but didn't import any external
> > data yet:
> >
> > http://www.peeron.com/inv
>
> Yep, that's just what I meant... With Lugnet, you and me,
> we will have three distinct implementations of the same functionality.
> I think we *really* should throw our efforts together to create
> *one* implementation (which could coincidentally be hosted on
> lugnet).
the biggest thing everyone should agree on is the nameing convention... We
used partsref and partid for ours, which seemed to be the most complete and
easy to use convention... All the rest is really easy to transform, from
one format to another...
Dan
|
|
| |
In lugnet.db.inv, Dan Boger writes:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 11:44:01AM +0000, Hakan Tandogan wrote:
> > Did anyone compile the inventories that were posted here
> > in a machine-readable format, possibly even integrating it with
> > the data from set inventories at lugnet? I'd really like to continue
> > the work of Tim Vattima.
> >
> > Wouldn't it be wonderful if the Set guide contained links
> > to the (existing) set inventories? I intend to spend a few days
> > during Christmas with a database / search engine on my home server;
> > but I could also contribute my programming skills (and those few
> > days ;-) ) to lugnet.
>
> well, we started creating something similar, but didn't import any external
> data yet:
>
> http://www.peeron.com/inv
>
> :)
This is great!
Todd: How about linking the element count in the set guide to the
corresponding inventory page on dands site?
KL
> Dan
|
|
|
