| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Wayne Gramlich wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
> I was wondering what was happening to LSC effort, and here I discover there was
> yet
> another newsgroup that I should have been subscribed to. I'll spend later
> tonight
> catching up on what I've missed.
Yeah, the compartmentalized among us were asking I post LSC stuff in
cad.dev.org.ldraw :-)
> With regards to the LSC nomination, as much as I would like to accept the
> nomination, at this time I do not meet LSC requirements. I might add that I
> think the LSC membership requirements
> are exteremely reasonable. Thus, I request that you withdraw the nomination.
Consider it withdrawn. My mistake for not thinking ahead :-)
I'd like to add a nomination for Larry Pieniazek - he was also involved in sorta
the preliminary discussion that lead to the LSC Proposal drafts, and has some
good ideas.
> If the LSC that forms wishes to ask my opinions on procedures and processes
> based on my previous W3C work, I will be delighted to chime in.
I hope they are interested in what you have to say - your advice and insight has
been invaluable to me.
-Tim
|
|
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney wrote:
>
> I'd like to add a nomination for Larry Pieniazek - he was also involved in sorta
> the preliminary discussion that lead to the LSC Proposal drafts, and has some
> good ideas.
I've given this some considerable thought and while I think it's important to
have a community focused voice on the committee, I have decided to decline this
nomination. There are a number of other very well qualified nominees and I'm
concerned about getting spread too thin. I want to thank Tim and others for
their expressions of support, though.
I do plan to stand for the overall Ldraw.org executive committee once those
elections are launched, though. (and it is my expectation that will be happening
fairly soon, the LSC election should validate a lot of the technical work that
will make elections happen).
|
|
|
